From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6B813AD06; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717659467; cv=none; b=nZ76Gjs9sWrFrWqBTCg2bKqH6ZWxTSJJhTeDP+2JhiDThz6IyHdf/uPSozdJvcXGEYUzmYrwmUpj3IQDAYOlUylOdbA7zYmeWEmKqKMTcGKe6yk7RI7J8TsuKVVeVBQB4Yyfm4k/RLtS47/LpB/vRHStkePDBT5nQDIFq4liyhY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717659467; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a2LuMo4gSmwdzRlaVNt1YnokeK3if9obfVCp+HFlEZs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BwcqF/dRg5shKnx1YzXLqzC5J1GPXhCQU5HdoTf5FKY38xQQIU7y45KBRcY6el3FDwJeCTIfYqgRVV2rDTXlUE6rorU+9gM/u0beYqJLew1OAgoMdDykkWsLR9V6gWOxPJf+A6Bf67Kv/AeVpqBraW9Jxfknta+LMbG5BbzsVcU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Received: from i53875b65.versanet.de ([83.135.91.101] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sF7gh-0006li-LF; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 09:37:31 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Alex Bee , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add SFC support for RK3128 Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 09:37:29 +0200 Message-ID: <7129744.aoefvbuG5b@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20240605205209.232005-1-knaerzche@gmail.com> <20240605205209.232005-6-knaerzche@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2024, 08:41:19 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 05/06/2024 22:52, Alex Bee wrote: > > This series adds support for the Serial Flash Controller (SFC) found in > > RK3128 SoCs. > > > > As without using some "id holes" we would run out clock ids in the binding > > and would have to touch the ABI, I added patches which removes the > > CLK_NR_CLKS macro and uses the recently introduced > > rockchip_clk_find_max_clk_id helper instead to find the highest clock id. > > > > changes since v1: > > - added patches to remove CLK_NR_CLKS (Connor) > > > > Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated > or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might > interfere with applying entire sets. > > You sent now v2 immediately after. Confused. it looks like Alex had some mail trouble yesterday. The thread you Acked patches in actually is v2, just missing the label. - original v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605172154.193047-1-knaerzche@gmail.com - "unlabeled" v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605205209.232005-1-knaerzche@gmail.com/ - this as v2, but as reply to the previous - real v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605210049.232284-1-knaerzche@gmail.com/ The last 3 are identical, just the sending process was somehow fumbled.