devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Christian Melki <christian.melki@t2data.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] Microchip OTPC driver on SAM9X60 exposing UIDxR as additional nvmem device
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 19:17:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <717bd06f-3eba-4825-a53f-b2f9aa1c81c8@tuxon.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240821105943.230281-1-ada@thorsis.com>

Hi, Alexander,

On 21.08.2024 13:59, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hei hei,
> 
> on a custom sam9x60 based board we want to access a unique ID of the
> SoC.  Microchip sam-ba has a command 'readuniqueid' which returns the
> content of the OTPC Product UID x Register in that case.
> 
> (On different boards with a SAMA5D2 we use the Serial Number x Register
> exposed through the atmel soc driver.  Those registers are not present
> in the SAM9X60 series, but only for SAMA5D2/SAMA5D4 AFAIK.)

Not sure if you are talking about Chip ID, Chip ID extension registers.
These are available also on SAM9X60.

> 
> There is a driver for the OTPC of the SAMA7G5 and after comparing
> register layouts it seems that one is almost identical to the one used
> by SAM9X60.  Currently that driver has no support for the UIDx
> registers, but I suppose it would be the right place to implement it,
> because the registers are within the OTPC register address offsets.
> 
> The patch series starts with fixups for the current driver.  It then
> adds the necessary pieces to DT and driver to work on SAM9X60 in
> general.  Later support for enabling the main RC oscillator is added,
> which is required on SAM9X60 for the OTPC to work.  The last patch adds
> an additional nvmem device for the UIDx registers.
> 
> This v1 of the series was _not_ tested on SAMA7G5, because I don't have
> such a board for testing.  Actually I don't know if the main_rc_osc
> clock is required on SAMA7G5 too, and if yes how to handle that with
> regard to the different clock ids.  If someone could test on SAMA7G5
> and/or help me sorting out the core clock id things, that would be
> highly appreciated.

Please add Nicolas in the loop on the next revisions of this series as this
should also be tested on SAMA7G5. I don't have a SAMA7G5 with OTP memory
populated.

> 
> Also I assume some more devicetree and/or sysfs documentation is
> necessary.  If someone could point me what's exactly required, this
> would be very helpful for me.  You see I expect at least another version
> v2 of the series. ;-)
> 
> Maybe some files having that "sama7g5" should be renamed, because that
> DT binding is used for more SoCs now and deserves a more generic name?

Not needed, adding your compatible there is enough.

> Thinking of these for example:
> 
> - Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml
> - include/dt-bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.h
> 
> Are there other SoCs than SAMA7G5 and SAM9X60 using the same OTPC?
> 
> Last question: Should the UID be added to the device entropy pool with
> add_device_randomness() as done in the SAMA5D2 sfr driver?
> 
> I sent an RFC patch on this topic earlier this year, you'll find the
> link below as a reference to the discussion.  The patch itself was
> trivial and not meant for applying as is anyways, so I decided to not
> write a full changelog from RFC to v1.
> 
> Last not least, special thanks to Christian Melki on IRC, who wrote and
> tested parts of this, and was very kind and helpful in discussing the
> topic several times in the past months.
> 
> Christian, if you feel there's credit missing, just point me where to
> add Co-developed-by and I'll happily do that for v2.
> 
> Greets
> Alex
> 
> (series based on v6.11-rc4)
> 
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240412140802.1571935-2-ada@thorsis.com/
> 
> Alexander Dahl (12):
>   nvmem: microchip-otpc: Avoid writing a write-only register
>   nvmem: microchip-otpc: Fix swapped 'sleep' and 'timeout' parameters
>   dt-bindings: nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add compatible for SAM9X60
>   nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add SAM9X60 support
>   ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Add OTPC node
>   ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60_curiosity: Enable OTP Controller
>   nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add missing register definitions
>   nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add warnings for bad OTPC conditions on probe
>   clk: at91: sam9x60: Allow enabling main_rc_osc through DT
>   ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Add clock properties to OTPC
>   nvmem: microchip-otpc: Enable main RC oscillator clock
>   nvmem: microchip-otpc: Expose UID registers as 2nd nvmem device
> 
>  .../nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml         |  1 +
>  .../dts/microchip/at91-sam9x60_curiosity.dts  |  4 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi      | 10 +++
>  drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c                    |  3 +-
>  drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c                | 86 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/at91.h              |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 47ac09b91befbb6a235ab620c32af719f8208399

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-24 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-21 10:59 [PATCH v1 00/12] Microchip OTPC driver on SAM9X60 exposing UIDxR as additional nvmem device Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21 10:59 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] dt-bindings: nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add compatible for SAM9X60 Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21 12:49   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-08-21 14:55   ` Conor Dooley
2024-08-21 10:59 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Add OTPC node Alexander Dahl
2024-08-24 15:56   ` claudiu beznea
2024-08-21 10:59 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60_curiosity: Enable OTP Controller Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21 10:59 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] clk: at91: sam9x60: Allow enabling main_rc_osc through DT Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21 15:55   ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-19 12:39   ` Alexander Dahl
2024-09-24 15:52     ` Ryan Wanner
2024-09-25 15:24       ` Nicolas Ferre
2024-09-26  7:42       ` claudiu beznea
2024-10-01 15:04         ` Ryan Wanner
2025-02-07 12:41           ` Alexander Dahl
2024-08-21 10:59 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] ARM: dts: microchip: sam9x60: Add clock properties to OTPC Alexander Dahl
2024-08-24 15:57   ` claudiu beznea
2024-08-28  8:22     ` Alexander Dahl
2024-08-24 16:17 ` claudiu beznea [this message]
2024-08-28  7:31   ` [PATCH v1 00/12] Microchip OTPC driver on SAM9X60 exposing UIDxR as additional nvmem device Alexander Dahl
2024-08-31 15:38     ` claudiu beznea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=717bd06f-3eba-4825-a53f-b2f9aa1c81c8@tuxon.dev \
    --to=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=ada@thorsis.com \
    --cc=christian.melki@t2data.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).