From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] musb: Add support for the Allwinner sunxi musb controller Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:31:53 +0100 Message-ID: <7198432.YfztEdzB1p@wuerfel> References: <1425933628-9672-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <2227491.z0aBeXi5ZG@wuerfel> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Hans de Goede , Felipe Balbi , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Maxime Ripard , Roman Byshko , linux-usb , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree , linux-sunxi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 10 March 2015 09:46:24 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > I believe you are talking about "mmio-sram"? Yes. > The syscon here represents a switch, to toggle whether a block of SRAM is > mapped into the CPU memory space, or to a specific devices private address > space. It is not the actual SRAM. > > The SRAM DT binding is orthogonal to this, if not irrelevant when the block > is mapped privately, as it is no longer visible from the DT's PoV. Ok, got it. I missed this part when reading the introduction. syscon seems fine to me then. Arnd