From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] arm64: dts: exynos: Add dts files for 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:48:57 +0100 Message-ID: <7412525.l6YnQcTxtg@wuerfel> References: <1424755011-15999-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <7139111.LGA4lhSjob@wuerfel> <54EC3BB1.1020701@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54EC3BB1.1020701@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: kgene@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, olof@lixom.net, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, inki.dae@samsung.com, chanho61.park@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com, jh80.chung@samsung.com, ideal.song@samsung.com, a.kesavan@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 24 February 2015 17:52:01 Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > But, I have a question. > If we put the aliases into the board dts file instaed of SoC dtsi, > each board dts file may use the different alias name about same phandle. Yes, that is the idea. In particular with the uarts, the intention is that the numbering of the device nodes in /dev is the same that is printed on the board (if any), which may be different from the numbering internal to the SoC. Arnd