From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB0813F451; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 20:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717534116; cv=none; b=qiRWmWkkA610738OHR3vsVmft/lpl0TFfun0J0LC9aWIA1xehirgzfG3n6217tosOj03mHdw57IXVQlYiibbEVZ98mfNzZQbKyUdlWsxGgiTV7afpA9oT6PrVra/pJDa3ECv1ikG7K/2z6LJpXxsWYXeCDR0qniJczNUQG43yLQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717534116; c=relaxed/simple; bh=24z1rBJP/t4A6eeiNMz6cumSnbPF5JflnPk3fIfkeYM=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=LCw2Yj4Fo4UMm5BCEXZymy6RoGQ2PsptCZRHb3B1alcZ2pzdLUdcR5aTSNw7QwYx4Tym4AgqlnUxuOiWhjF01+Ks2VpM7QyVqkSEctKPY86ioLd9HqUW6wMlkxEprY8dTAaY4DpHqvyp0ri08LooAuFAsWYtRXpJCoYiC42VOkE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=AyEZbuQE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="AyEZbuQE" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1717534112; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jaTzlawGlDcYRhQAm+R1AsWpCyayK2cAnVa+Y0OsHVQ=; b=AyEZbuQEG/qqS8hCg4QaBIOxBX5BDnlwIu08AMxosoc84FDiVVV5NnCCTRWyhFB4zo5xVV Mqf8T7Qr9+QUghlk4yVtaLV0HE9dLTRffsJyizkktmF01hfJTm8DXRaX92E2WANTcuw9qC w4A4pFK81Zc09M++1RkPeePFtqjojo5/EVcinZZBjENohmQv3PByt+ZdvBqTT4sIw3l9XQ 0xixHMlzRPKwYzIJHUZ5J9El7sfvISr3oEKry2exmbn/eKp2SLdv/reoa0IGUazY4NSGwV ry6MW+Ao7vnlq9nEmfX+fJgg4lbEia7kzrfWlCJ4aCEfSCWSNDe2v0vQO34A5A== Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 22:48:30 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Alexey Charkov Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, wens@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, didi.debian@cknow.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Make preparations for per-RK3588-variant OPPs In-Reply-To: <82db817a908b761d8c3d73ea04714314@manjaro.org> References: <673dcf47596e7bc8ba065034e339bb1bbf9cdcb0.1716948159.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <8f8623e29a479c4108141302e708dc3b@manjaro.org> <166cc4e46f31644a50306625b2ab18a6@manjaro.org> <82db817a908b761d8c3d73ea04714314@manjaro.org> Message-ID: <75563ad3f6bf6b6c8b151ab0cc26b490@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org Hello Alexey, On 2024-05-30 21:31, Dragan Simic wrote: > I'm sorry for my delayed response, had some "IRL stuff" to take care > of. [...] > On 2024-05-29 16:05, Alexey Charkov wrote: >> The problem I have with -common is that there are several layers of >> "common" even among just the three of these chip revisions, and a >> clear inheritance hierarchy between them (i.e. RK3588j and RK3588 also >> have a sizeable chunk of their IP blocks that is "common" between >> these two variants, in addition to those shared among all three >> variants) > > Hmm, I see, that's a rather valid concern. How about using "-base" > for what I called "-common", and "-extra" for what I called "-fullfat", > for the lack of a better term? Using "-extra" takes inspiration from > the way Linux distribution package repositories are commonly named, so > it should be rather familiar to nearly everyone. > > Also, "-base" and "-extra" are rather short, so their shortness would > also make them stand out in the directory listing as something that > isn't > just another board .dts or .dtsi file, which can only help. [...] Since there were no complaints, I'll move forward with sending a "real" patch that uses "-base" and "-extra".