From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ivo.g.dimitrov.75-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
sre-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
pali.rohar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree: Add video bus switch
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 19:54:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75694885.3PuLWzx4qN@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170204215610.GA9243@amd>
Hi Pavel,
On Saturday, 4 February 2017 23:56:10 EET Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >>>> +Required properties
> >>>> +===================
> >>>> +
> >>>> +compatible : must contain "video-bus-switch"
> >>>
> >>> How generic is this? Should we have e.g. nokia,video-bus-switch? And
> >>> if so, change the file name accordingly.
> >>
> >> Generic for "single GPIO controls the switch", AFAICT. But that should
> >> be common enough...
> >
> > Um, yes. Then... how about: video-bus-switch-gpio? No Nokia prefix.
>
> Ok, done. I also fixed the english a bit.
>
> >>>> +reg : The interface:
> >>>> + 0 - port for image signal processor
> >>>> + 1 - port for first camera sensor
> >>>> + 2 - port for second camera sensor
> >>>
> >>> I'd say this must be pretty much specific to the one in N900. You
> >>> could have more ports. Or you could say that ports beyond 0 are
> >>> camera sensors. I guess this is good enough for now though, it can be
> >>> changed later on with the source if a need arises.
> >>
> >> Well, I'd say that selecting between two sensors is going to be the
> >> common case. If someone needs more than two, it will no longer be
> >> simple GPIO, so we'll have some fixing to do.
> >
> > It could be two GPIOs --- that's how the GPIO I2C mux works.
> >
> > But I'd be surprised if someone ever uses something like that
> > again. ;-)
>
> I'd say.. lets handle that when we see hardware like that.
>
> >>> Btw. was it still considered a problem that the endpoint properties
> >>> for the sensors can be different? With the g_routing() pad op which is
> >>> to be added, the ISP driver (should actually go to a framework
> >>> somewhere) could parse the graph and find the proper endpoint there.
> >>
> >> I don't know about g_routing. I added g_endpoint_config method that
> >> passes the configuration, and that seems to work for me.
> >>
> >> I don't see g_routing in next-20170201 . Is there place to look?
> >
> > I think there was a patch by Laurent to LMML quite some time ago. I
> > suppose that set will be repicked soonish.
> >
> > I don't really object using g_endpoint_config() as a temporary solution;
> > I'd like to have Laurent's opinion on that though. Another option is to
> > wait, but we've already waited a looong time (as in total).
>
> Laurent, do you have some input here? We have simple "2 cameras
> connected to one signal processor" situation here. We need some way of
> passing endpoint configuration from the sensors through the switch. I
> did this:
Could you give me a bit more information about the platform you're targeting:
how the switch is connected, what kind of switch it is, and what endpoint
configuration data you need ?
> >> @@ -415,6 +416,8 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops {
> >> const struct v4l2_mbus_config *cfg);
> >> int (*s_rx_buffer)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, void *buf,
> >> unsigned int *size);
> >> + int (*g_endpoint_config)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >> + struct v4l2_of_endpoint *cfg);
>
> Google of g_routing tells me:
>
> 9) Highly reconfigurable hardware - Julien Beraud
>
> - 44 sub-devices connected with an interconnect.
> - As long as formats match, any sub-device could be connected to any
> - other sub-device through a link.
> - The result is 44 * 44 links at worst.
> - A switch sub-device proposed as the solution to model the
> - interconnect. The sub-devices are connected to the switch
> - sub-devices through the hardware links that connect to the
> - interconnect.
> - The switch would be controlled through new IOCTLs S_ROUTING and
> - G_ROUTING.
> - Patches available:
> http://git.linuxtv.org/cgit.cgi/pinchartl/media.git/log/?h=xilinx-wip
>
> but the patches are from 2005. So I guess I'll need some guidance here...
You made me feel very old for a moment. The patches are from 2015 :-)
> > I'll reply to the other patch containing the code.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20161023200355.GA5391@amd>
[not found] ` <20161119232943.GF13965@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20161214122451.GB27011@amd>
[not found] ` <20161222100104.GA30917@amd>
[not found] ` <20161222133938.GA30259@amd>
[not found] ` <20161224152031.GA8420@amd>
2017-02-03 12:35 ` [PATCH] devicetree: Add video bus switch Pavel Machek
2017-02-03 13:07 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-02-03 21:06 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-03 21:34 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-02-04 21:56 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-04 22:33 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-02-05 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-05 23:40 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-12-20 17:54 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-12-21 9:05 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-21 16:36 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2017-12-22 9:24 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-03 13:32 ` Pali Rohár
2017-02-03 21:07 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-04 1:04 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-02-08 21:36 ` Rob Herring
2017-02-08 22:30 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-09 23:02 ` Rob Herring
2017-02-09 23:03 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqLfbAxBbXOyK0QOCc=wPe6=a+qyrAwtdbt3DtspK6oiaw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-10 19:54 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-10 22:17 ` Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <20170210221742.GI13854-S+BSfZ9RZZmRSg0ZkenSGLdO1Tsj/99ntUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-13 9:54 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-13 10:20 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-03-02 8:54 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-08 22:34 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-09 22:58 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqK2RHLoLc_ikHzP2B5_Lof2g9NG+zvamGe4o1ko1ggGQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-10 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75694885.3PuLWzx4qN@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart-rylnwiuwjnjg/c1bvhzhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pali.rohar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sre-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox