Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8dxl: Add SolidRun SoM and HummingBoard

Vladimir Oltean
2026-04-30T12:03:50Z

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 11:48:45AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
> > Also, can you use udev for user
> > interface naming?
> Possibly .... I am aware of systemd (udev) based default behaviour
> for network interface aliases (eth0, eth1, ...).
>
> However I have not seen it for dsa switch ports.

In /etc/udev/rules.d/10-network.rules:

ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNELS=="spi2.0", DRIVERS=="sja1105", ATTR{phys_port_name}=="p0", NAME="lan0"
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNELS=="spi2.0", DRIVERS=="sja1105", ATTR{phys_port_name}=="p1", NAME="lan1"
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNELS=="spi2.0", DRIVERS=="sja1105", ATTR{phys_port_name}=="p2", NAME="lan2"
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNELS=="spi2.0", DRIVERS=="sja1105", ATTR{phys_port_name}=="p3", NAME="lan3"
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNELS=="spi2.0", DRIVERS=="sja1105", ATTR{phys_port_name}=="p4", NAME="lan4"
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNELS=="spi2.0", DRIVERS=="sja1105", ATTR{phys_port_name}=="p5", NAME="lan5"

>
> It has been common practice for switch ports to be named lan[0-9]+,
> and I'd prefer to keep it that way here too.
> Predictable names are important for users in particular when interfaces
> are of different types and at different connectors.
>
> Re. the T1 ports names I didn't know whether to use "lan" or "trx".
> For those if "lan" is preferred, I can change them.

No objection to your naming choice. Just want to point out that we
encourage DSA users to use the same naming infrastructure as any other
net device. The device tree labels mostly come from deeply embedded
environments where a full udev implementation is missing (like OpenWrt).
If you don't have that excuse, you can try to leave the labels in the
device tree out and set up predictable names through an udev rule.