* [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: add i2c-bus subnode to edp @ 2016-10-20 8:07 Tomeu Vizoso 2016-10-20 13:45 ` Heiko Stübner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tomeu Vizoso @ 2016-10-20 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Tomeu Vizoso, Randy Li, Jon Hunter, Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, devicetree Add an empty 'i2c-bus' subnode to the edp node just so that the I2C core doesn't attemp to parse the 'ports' subnode as containing i2c devices. This is to avoid spurious failure messages such as: i2c i2c-6: of_i2c: modalias failure on /dp@ff970000/ports Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Cc: Randy Li <randy.li@rock-chips.com> Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi index 2f814ffeb605..94f4b7eecca2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi @@ -1075,6 +1075,11 @@ }; }; }; + + i2c-bus { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + }; }; hdmi: hdmi@ff980000 { -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: add i2c-bus subnode to edp 2016-10-20 8:07 [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: add i2c-bus subnode to edp Tomeu Vizoso @ 2016-10-20 13:45 ` Heiko Stübner 2016-10-20 13:47 ` Tomeu Vizoso 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Heiko Stübner @ 2016-10-20 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tomeu Vizoso, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland Cc: linux-kernel, Randy Li, Jon Hunter, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, devicetree Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2016, 10:07:25 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: > Add an empty 'i2c-bus' subnode to the edp node just so that the I2C core > doesn't attemp to parse the 'ports' subnode as containing i2c devices. > > This is to avoid spurious failure messages such as: > > i2c i2c-6: of_i2c: modalias failure on /dp@ff970000/ports On the one hand, the edp really has an i2c bus - with its only client the EDID listening at 0x50 (and maybe 0x30). On the other hand, adding an empty bus to the (implementation independent) devicetree just to make the Linux i2c subsystem happy sounds heavily like a implementation-specific hack, as the edp i2c bus doesn't leak into the outside world otherwise. I guess this empty i2c bus not being part of the binding document points heavily into the implementation-specific corner :-) . My short search on other patches touching this didn't reveal anything but maybe this was already discussed somewhere and found to be ok? Another option could be to just make of_i2c_register_device silent if of_modalias_node returns -ENODEV? Heiko > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> > Cc: Randy Li <randy.li@rock-chips.com> > Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi > index 2f814ffeb605..94f4b7eecca2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi > @@ -1075,6 +1075,11 @@ > }; > }; > }; > + > + i2c-bus { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + }; > }; > > hdmi: hdmi@ff980000 { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: add i2c-bus subnode to edp 2016-10-20 13:45 ` Heiko Stübner @ 2016-10-20 13:47 ` Tomeu Vizoso [not found] ` <6083453f-08e1-643a-9638-1db38c704aa5-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tomeu Vizoso @ 2016-10-20 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiko Stübner, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland Cc: linux-kernel, Randy Li, Jon Hunter, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, devicetree On 10/20/2016 03:45 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2016, 10:07:25 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: >> Add an empty 'i2c-bus' subnode to the edp node just so that the I2C core >> doesn't attemp to parse the 'ports' subnode as containing i2c devices. >> >> This is to avoid spurious failure messages such as: >> >> i2c i2c-6: of_i2c: modalias failure on /dp@ff970000/ports > > On the one hand, the edp really has an i2c bus - with its only client the EDID > listening at 0x50 (and maybe 0x30). > > On the other hand, adding an empty bus to the (implementation independent) > devicetree just to make the Linux i2c subsystem happy sounds heavily like a > implementation-specific hack, as the edp i2c bus doesn't leak into the outside > world otherwise. > > I guess this empty i2c bus not being part of the binding document points > heavily into the implementation-specific corner :-) . > > My short search on other patches touching this didn't reveal anything but > maybe this was already discussed somewhere and found to be ok? Here it is: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-tegra/msg27862.html Regards, Tomeu > Another option could be to just make of_i2c_register_device silent if > of_modalias_node returns -ENODEV? > > > Heiko > >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> >> Cc: Randy Li <randy.li@rock-chips.com> >> Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi >> index 2f814ffeb605..94f4b7eecca2 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi >> @@ -1075,6 +1075,11 @@ >> }; >> }; >> }; >> + >> + i2c-bus { >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> }; >> >> hdmi: hdmi@ff980000 { > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <6083453f-08e1-643a-9638-1db38c704aa5-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: add i2c-bus subnode to edp [not found] ` <6083453f-08e1-643a-9638-1db38c704aa5-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-10-21 8:25 ` Heiko Stuebner 2016-10-22 3:52 ` ayaka 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2016-10-21 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tomeu Vizoso Cc: Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Randy Li, Jon Hunter, Russell King, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2016, 15:47:56 CEST schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: > On 10/20/2016 03:45 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2016, 10:07:25 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: > >> Add an empty 'i2c-bus' subnode to the edp node just so that the I2C core > >> doesn't attemp to parse the 'ports' subnode as containing i2c devices. > >> > >> This is to avoid spurious failure messages such as: > >> > >> i2c i2c-6: of_i2c: modalias failure on /dp@ff970000/ports > > > > On the one hand, the edp really has an i2c bus - with its only client the > > EDID listening at 0x50 (and maybe 0x30). > > > > On the other hand, adding an empty bus to the (implementation independent) > > devicetree just to make the Linux i2c subsystem happy sounds heavily like > > a > > implementation-specific hack, as the edp i2c bus doesn't leak into the > > outside world otherwise. > > > > I guess this empty i2c bus not being part of the binding document points > > heavily into the implementation-specific corner :-) . > > > > My short search on other patches touching this didn't reveal anything but > > maybe this was already discussed somewhere and found to be ok? > > Here it is: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-tegra/msg27862.html thanks ... I'm still not sure about the placeholder though, aka needing an undocumented subnode to make a Linux error message silent. In the thread you pointed to I also did not see any dt-maintainer involvement pointing one way or another, but spinics is often not easy to navigate threads, so I may have missed that. > > Another option could be to just make of_i2c_register_device silent if > > of_modalias_node returns -ENODEV? Heiko > >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> > >> Cc: Randy Li <randy.li-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org> > >> Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > >> --- > >> > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 5 +++++ > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi > >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi > >> index 2f814ffeb605..94f4b7eecca2 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi > >> @@ -1075,6 +1075,11 @@ > >> > >> }; > >> > >> }; > >> > >> }; > >> > >> + > >> + i2c-bus { > >> + #address-cells = <1>; > >> + #size-cells = <0>; > >> + }; > >> > >> }; > >> > >> hdmi: hdmi@ff980000 { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: add i2c-bus subnode to edp 2016-10-21 8:25 ` Heiko Stuebner @ 2016-10-22 3:52 ` ayaka 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: ayaka @ 2016-10-22 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiko Stuebner, Tomeu Vizoso Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Russell King, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, Rob Herring, Jon Hunter, linux-arm-kernel On 10/21/2016 04:25 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2016, 15:47:56 CEST schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: >> On 10/20/2016 03:45 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: >>> Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2016, 10:07:25 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso: >>>> Add an empty 'i2c-bus' subnode to the edp node just so that the I2C core >>>> doesn't attemp to parse the 'ports' subnode as containing i2c devices. >>>> >>>> This is to avoid spurious failure messages such as: >>>> >>>> i2c i2c-6: of_i2c: modalias failure on /dp@ff970000/ports >>> On the one hand, the edp really has an i2c bus - with its only client the >>> EDID listening at 0x50 (and maybe 0x30). >>> >>> On the other hand, adding an empty bus to the (implementation independent) >>> devicetree just to make the Linux i2c subsystem happy sounds heavily like >>> a >>> implementation-specific hack, as the edp i2c bus doesn't leak into the >>> outside world otherwise. >>> >>> I guess this empty i2c bus not being part of the binding document points >>> heavily into the implementation-specific corner :-) . >>> >>> My short search on other patches touching this didn't reveal anything but >>> maybe this was already discussed somewhere and found to be ok? >> Here it is: >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-tegra/msg27862.html > thanks ... I'm still not sure about the placeholder though, aka needing an > undocumented subnode to make a Linux error message silent. Sorry, I report the error result, it would work. And about the problem at this thread beginning, I found I have to use something like Xserver to access DRM or the panel would not be power on. The legacy fbdev won't help. But there is still problem to be solved, so the eDP panel for firefly is not ready yet. > > In the thread you pointed to I also did not see any dt-maintainer involvement > pointing one way or another, but spinics is often not easy to navigate > threads, so I may have missed that. > > >>> Another option could be to just make of_i2c_register_device silent if >>> of_modalias_node returns -ENODEV? > > Heiko > >>>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> >>>> Cc: Randy Li <randy.li@rock-chips.com> >>>> Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 5 +++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi >>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi >>>> index 2f814ffeb605..94f4b7eecca2 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi >>>> @@ -1075,6 +1075,11 @@ >>>> >>>> }; >>>> >>>> }; >>>> >>>> }; >>>> >>>> + >>>> + i2c-bus { >>>> + #address-cells = <1>; >>>> + #size-cells = <0>; >>>> + }; >>>> >>>> }; >>>> >>>> hdmi: hdmi@ff980000 { > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-22 3:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-20 8:07 [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: add i2c-bus subnode to edp Tomeu Vizoso
2016-10-20 13:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-10-20 13:47 ` Tomeu Vizoso
[not found] ` <6083453f-08e1-643a-9638-1db38c704aa5-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-21 8:25 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-10-22 3:52 ` ayaka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).