From: me@herrie.org
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Herman van Hazendonk <github.com@herrie.org>,
linusw@kernel.org, denis.ciocca@st.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com,
nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com,
maudspierings@gocontroll.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: common: st_sensors: honour channel endianness in read_axis_data
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:12:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a4f25be10eae7c22125863a2523f435@herrie.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260614193908.522272ed@jic23-huawei>
On 2026-06-14 20:39, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 12:08:41 +0200
> Herman van Hazendonk <github.com@herrie.org> wrote:
>
>> st_sensors_read_axis_data() unconditionally decoded multi-byte
>> results with get_unaligned_le16() / get_unaligned_le24() regardless
>> of the channel's declared scan_type.endianness.
>>
>> For every ST sensor that has used this helper since it was introduced
>> this happened to be fine because the ST IMU/accel/gyro/pressure
>> families publish their data registers as little-endian and the
>> channel specs in those drivers declare IIO_LE accordingly.
>>
>> The LSM303DLH magnetometer however publishes its X/Y/Z output as a
>> pair of big-endian bytes (the H register sits at the lower address,
>> 0x03/0x05/0x07, and the L register immediately after), and its
>> channel specs in st_magn_core.c correctly declare IIO_BE -- but
>> read_axis_data() ignored that and decoded as little-endian, swapping
>> the high and low bytes of every magnetometer sample.
>>
>> The bug is most visible on a stationary chip: in earth's field the
>> true X reading is small and the high byte sits at 0x00, so swapping
>> the bytes pins sysfs X at exactly the low byte's pattern (e.g. 0x00F0
>> = 240). Y and Z still appear "to vary" because their magnitudes are
>> larger and the noise in the low byte produces big swings in the
>> swapped high byte:
>>
>> before (chip flat, sysfs in_magn_*_raw):
>> X=240 (stuck), Y= 12032..23296, Z=-16128..-9728
>>
>> after (direct i2c-dev big-endian decode, same chip same
>> orientation):
>> X≈-4096, Y≈210, Z≈80 (sensible values reflecting earth's
>> ambient field at low gauss range)
>>
>> Fix read_axis_data() to dispatch on ch->scan_type.endianness and
>> call get_unaligned_be16() / get_unaligned_be24() when the channel
>> declares IIO_BE. Existing IIO_LE consumers (st_accel, st_gyro,
>> st_pressure, st_lsm6dsx and others) are unaffected because their
>> channel specs already declare IIO_LE and the LE path is unchanged.
>>
> Hi Herman,
>
> Fixes tag please. We want to know how far to backport and provide
> info to those trying to work out if the bug affects their kernel
> trees.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jonathan
>
>> Signed-off-by: Herman van Hazendonk <github.com@herrie.org>
Hi Jonathan,
I've been working with the HP TouchPad which uses the Qualcomm APQ8060
to bring this to mainline kernel, which was running a very ancient
2.6.35 kernel where I could compare things since it was working there
without issues, hence I could compare them side by side, check values
etc.
It seems this "bug" was introduced with 3.9:
Fixes: 23491b513bcd ("iio:common: Add STMicroelectronics common
library")
That's the commit that introduced st_sensors_read_axis_data() with the
unconditional get_unaligned_le16() decode.
I'll include that for the v2.
Thanks,
Herman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 10:08 [PATCH 0/3] iio: lsm303dlh-magn: endianness + boot-time fullscale selection Herman van Hazendonk
2026-06-05 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: common: st_sensors: honour channel endianness in read_axis_data Herman van Hazendonk
2026-06-05 17:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-15 12:41 ` me
2026-06-14 18:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-15 11:12 ` me [this message]
2026-06-05 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: st,st-sensors: add st,fullscale-mg Herman van Hazendonk
2026-06-05 16:07 ` Conor Dooley
2026-06-07 22:54 ` Linus Walleij
2026-06-14 18:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-15 11:16 ` me
2026-06-21 12:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-05 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: magnetometer: st_magn: honour st,fullscale-mg DT property Herman van Hazendonk
2026-06-05 17:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-15 12:40 ` me
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a4f25be10eae7c22125863a2523f435@herrie.org \
--to=me@herrie.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=denis.ciocca@st.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=github.com@herrie.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maudspierings@gocontroll.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox