Re: [PATCH 0/2] clk: qcom: Add support for GCC on QCS8300

[Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@quicinc.com>]

On 8/20/2024 4:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 03:38:39PM +0530, Imran Shaik wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/20/2024 3:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/08/2024 11:36, Imran Shaik wrote:
>>>> This series adds the dt-bindings and driver support for GCC on QCS8300 platform.
>>>>
>>>> Please note that this series is dependent on [1] which adds support
>>>> for QCS8275/QCS8300 SoC ID.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240814072806.4107079-1-quic_jingyw@quicinc.com/
>>>
>>> How do the depend? What is exactly the dependency?
>>>
>>> If so this cannot be merged...
>>>
>>
>> They are not functionally dependent, but we want to ensure the base QCS8300
>> changes to merge first and then our GCC changes. Hence added the dependency.
> 
> This does not work like that, these are different trees, even if they go
> via Bjorn.
> 
> Why do you insist on some specific workflow, different than every
> upstreaming process? What is so special here?
> 
> If you keep insisting, I will keep disagreeing, because it is not
> justified and just complicates things unnecessarily.

My bad, there is no dependency for clock tree actually, just wanted to 
provide the info that these GCC changes are for the newly defined SoC in 
the given series link. I will drop the dependency tag in the next series.

Thanks,
Imran