From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7708153BC3 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.154 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717667359; cv=none; b=OTpH6omlIVDeGTdNvs/qf0LCekk28SQvHEssm2uJnoa++Ia/YLbJyrNXDhlkr/RkLUxQrhat3fQqhVtyUmu9Wpmj3BpGaoqXRyE7A05K0XldV9Gy48TmHB6tlp2X6+GoX8RgAnaU91veqhIlPWKNJcsA+uR5g2Nq7ppZy3nb+g8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717667359; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0l98p+Hf5zWmytUlzXZpMoC4wXxBDLfTsek0INlCHrk=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=HnmdSf3xvDmguSOKgP6i4vobNaJJX4Xy/ITkdliCxmO8TGC5GIC+3NLIB+7ypufnGqfjWHC+I3MOpCry1z992FcJKtTgyRFZs+HoTzJuOJfXSxWPrOyp91C1Sx1Qi8WZv+MbihIhi4fkMxkfB17hqHuwfRPNWBQFyEkvgGIPplM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=testtoast.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=testtoast.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=testtoast.com header.i=@testtoast.com header.b=p7YjJ3Fg; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=g0Wb56c1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.154 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=testtoast.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=testtoast.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=testtoast.com header.i=@testtoast.com header.b="p7YjJ3Fg"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="g0Wb56c1" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B6D11401FE; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:49:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap47 ([10.202.2.97]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 Jun 2024 05:49:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=testtoast.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1717667356; x= 1717753756; bh=0l98p+Hf5zWmytUlzXZpMoC4wXxBDLfTsek0INlCHrk=; b=p 7YjJ3FgWGyZHe1wMuSxORvFXh+3ByRxfMqs97AcnaaSi6J2bwU+wTUCYortZTrTr digkkD084dpISQD36X1Dfw1l2GSP1tSb5PKtWDBTEZ3xHGWhxALlVdgvXf6cEUH/ S4rnbZ4TFb9j9LYJKm2aAaApN3xBYxAEvAqsQr1gB89EVguw4L+0zBFpDDY5JdRF O1owiqJzfRjPpKlyX/pkHbWwW2C9ZQEj1CQJCMxpW/1CtvDeznH8/gJaRRopNVOp G4KI/KB7RIYwYfoPvJ3VUC3+vGPyKrheQXd9iH6gUlNs4jsRj+/RGOpucd1is7rt ALq2ZT3VPfeUeTQnaYtuQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1717667356; x=1717753756; bh=0l98p+Hf5zWmytUlzXZpMoC4wXxB DLfTsek0INlCHrk=; b=g0Wb56c1vnTfSB3Dr1hCA0jaYAaSMWK4dWDY3Qq/vmql dTkGYW5NHTO8vZJ+M40l0kNZ9EoY3m7Bwrgz+FHcVIsqrALxTmpkg0NCb/5Ufb1U Cxo/gLklQBQG+LPOAxTcKufRjgfN9exggm82HHp6HsQKXa48RVyBkd5sFphK9YCi HnPETIG4EIqrXKYm4HhXQwN8B27pzfNyqQsgnLei5SoGD/gyebgPnEhDinntmHO4 MJTBUkU3v2LqjDrBO+HuEaoI/z3NEkG7QABCOD39NUAkvEnotEBvTRkIW3Edrp/o yBWMY9nqGV3KoY7gQl1e0K/0WWGF7OFgOxOf9Tk5TQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdelkedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftfih rghnucghrghlkhhlihhnfdcuoehrhigrnhesthgvshhtthhorghsthdrtghomheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfeghefgleejudfgudduueffhfdvudehteekveduudehhffhhefg gedtkeehkeetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdpfihhihhtvghquhgrrh hkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mheprhihrghnsehtvghsthhtohgrshhtrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: idc0145fc:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 06A6AA60078; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 05:49:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-497-g97f96844c-fm-20240526.001-g97f96844 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <7d9492ba-5285-471a-9ce7-c2148a388b41@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2dc1fdec-7673-4462-abe1-fecf8e3e826b@linaro.org> References: <20240530211415.44201-1-ryan@testtoast.com> <20240530211415.44201-3-ryan@testtoast.com> <20240606-intelligent-aromatic-magpie-80a7a4@houat> <2dc1fdec-7673-4462-abe1-fecf8e3e826b@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 21:48:54 +1200 From: "Ryan Walklin" To: "Neil Armstrong" , "Maxime Ripard" Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Jessica Zhang" , "Sam Ravnborg" , "David Airlie" , "Daniel Vetter" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Hironori KIKUCHI" , "Chris Morgan" , "Andre Przywara" , "John Watts" , "Conor Dooley" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add WL-355608-A8 panel Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 6 Jun 2024, at 9:32 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi Maxime, thanks for reviewing. > Where has this consensus been found? As Neil notes Conor suggested it [1], and we did consider Hironori's suggestion [2] of using anbernic as the vendor prefix, although my (not strong) feeling at the time was because Anbernic is not the panel vendor, just integrating an unknown OEM's panel into their devices, so at the time I fit was not quite accurate to say Anbernic was the vendor. Some discussion was also had on IRC at #linux-sunxi [3]. Admittedly not a *broad* consensus, but all offered opinions were taken and the patch was accepted subsequently. > For this kind of cases, we usually use the device it's attached to as > the vendor, so anbernic in this case. Can you send a followup patch? Thanks for the clarification, I was not aware of this. Happy to prepare one but will perhaps wait to see if there are any other comments. > Maxime Regards, Ryan [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20240525-velvet-citable-a45dd06847a7@spud/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAG40kxGEw4AyHk3P_dixKRdesGT0pLtMfpYcCCTbVGUs2NMD-w@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://oftc.irclog.whitequark.org/linux-sunxi/2024-05-27#332264