Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] clk: qcom: gcc-sm6375: Unregister critical clocks

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>]

On 4.01.2024 09:35, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 02:36:01PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Some clocks need to be always-on, but we don't really do anything
>> with them, other than calling enable() once and telling Linux they're
>> enabled.
>>
>> Unregister them to save a couple of bytes and, perhaps more
>> importantly, allow for runtime suspend of the clock controller device,
>> as CLK_IS_CRITICAL prevents the latter.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> 
>> @@ -3886,6 +3797,11 @@ static int gcc_sm6375_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x17028); /* GCC_CAMERA_XO_CLK */
>>  	qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x2b004); /* GCC_CPUSS_GNOC_CLK */
>>  	qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x1702c); /* GCC_DISP_XO_CLK */
>> +	qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x17008); /* GCC_CAMERA_AHB_CLK */
>> +	qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x1700c); /* GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK */
>> +	qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x36004); /* GCC_GPU_CFG_AHB_CLK */
>> +	qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x79004); /* GCC_SYS_NOC_CPUSS_AHB_CLK */
>> +	qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x17004); /* GCC_VIDEO_AHB_CLK */
> 
> Shouldn't you keep the above sorted by offset or at least try to group
> them by subsystem (e.g. keep the camera clocks together)?
Guess I assumed order-of-appearance sorting was fine when I made this
patch.

I can group it by hw block, though.

Konrad