From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [80.241.56.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 739B94E50AA; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 21:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789594029; cv=none; b=CneatjcToZbNq2g5ypw1J//GB2R5TnGOllS5b8gq+km/TMQUEktb2Xl7nob6btFSgJjKHJQa73qNx01sBdPYU1DJwWtZrweWmKGBUde0ZAImUyF4XHBEKsnQ0DwfymJWmWJFkS9dm4YQnnyWKS4lMGue5eWsvdD5obR5I0umvi0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789594029; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AsQqS9710lfvxj0MAvI/7hzneJ7P3AiAYoBeWGfNftk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Z5suS7NiCLRVS4J4bgZlu8fg/yOX43wwhPHRfHoKF9QY4Ik5dfaNI7MYjAStaf81bLiQJR6Dw9Q6ctJ9Omx4OBDXvAVvG9TKG2jtbfvyUWDWhvknSr5UvLouNPEtD4Xd2hkCbCkP1bpZ5YJzaMWsJ4mLiwKndAltuz6o7tyKouM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=im9OzdkX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="im9OzdkX" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hlX5R3dNfzKnS3; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 23:26:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1789594011; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Awx/qSMJsfDp5YFKo98US/4IxChQqsFBIzOvN17lZ2g=; b=im9OzdkXDGajHZYTNlRcWyDBOZJholJgFLe9R9NjoSNZx9LsAyzSKTgO0N4qur+kW7FVMl 6uIO5coBY64vQfHI19PRRAz8r9Y61KHNE6QiQXBOcvFp54qBdKnAzCwsSvO8p55VtbradN 33PYThsRqzNNfr20VYG5IlfQc6JXCt7rlPbmPNm5xoXzqioeOqJL32KIFHVpUnS/0jiQSX 8xpJezTHawYbzcHWLtZRW+GFNgpbWQiqmU8++1MKJIlx9JIC/2D0g2/fomqOwWBXQ7Kslt FsGHAhDPfX4KALihngTSnIZepHa4d+JYfNWSUo4Q47NSqAHusHdRhSPxJ6RU1g== Message-ID: <805629d1-ba2b-4e59-8d29-c374528367f9@mailbox.org> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 23:26:47 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: renesas: sparrow-hawk: Add overlay for WaveShare 2CH CANFD HAT To: Rob Herring , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Magnus Damm , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20260909151423.28358-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <34f4c088-5268-4add-aef4-33b3d3623c12@mailbox.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MBO-RS-META: h3pk3hdfad8iwfsccm1r6mrg3escspem X-MBO-RS-ID: 442b280c29c53d01ed2 On 9/16/26 10:49 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 10:55 AM Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> On 9/9/26 5:31 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> Hello Geert, >> >>>> + /* >>>> + * SPI_1 is operated as GPIO SPI, because MSIOF5 can not be >>>> + * muxed on the pins allocated for SPI_1 on this CANFD HAT. >>>> + */ >>>> + spi { /* SPI_1 */ >>> >>> As this lives at the root node, I'd rather change it back to >>> spi-ws-2ch-canfd while applying, if you don't mind? >> Please make sure the DT schema check does not complain about it, >> otherwise it is fine, thank you. > > It does complain: > > 1 spi-ws-2ch-canfd (spi-gpio): Unevaluated properties are not > allowed ('#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'can@0' were unexpected) > 1 spi-ws-2ch-canfd (spi-gpio): $nodename:0: 'spi-ws-2ch-canfd' > does not match '^spi(@.*|-([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]+))?$' > > The 1st warning is a side effect of the 2nd warning. > > "spi-1" like the comment says if just "spi" does not work. Geert send this fix today: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Relax node name suffixes again Maybe that works too ?