Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Add StarFive Camera Subsystem driver

[Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@starfivetech.com>]

On 2023/5/5 14:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/05/2023 07:57, Jack Zhu wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 2023/4/24 19:19, Jack Zhu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023/4/13 11:55, Jack Zhu wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This patch series adds support for the StarFive Camera Subsystem
>>>> found on StarFive JH7110 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> The driver implements V4L2, Media controller and V4L2 subdev interfaces.
>>>> Camera sensor using V4L2 subdev interface in the kernel is supported.
>>>>
>>>> The driver is tested on VisionFive V2 board with IMX219 camera sensor.
>>>> GStreamer 1.18.5 with v4l2src plugin is supported.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v3:
>>>> Patch 1:
>>>> - Modified port@0 and port@1 properties.
>>>> - Extended the port@0 example with appropriate properties.
>>>> - Added 'port@0' for 'required'
>>>> Patch 2:
>>>> - Modified spelling errors.
>>>> Patch 3:
>>>> - Merged patch 5 into the patch with an explanation for compatible in
>>>>   commit msg.
>>>> Patch 6:
>>>> - Asserted pixel_rst[i] reset in the loop after the err_disable_pixclk
>>>>   label.
>>>> - Modified Code Style for getting sys_rst and p_rst.
>>>> - Renamed clk_name to name and modified the relevant code.
>>>> Patch 9:
>>>> - Added static for stfcamss_get_mem_res function.
>>>> - Added static for isp_close function.
>>>> - Fixed implicit conversion warning for stf_vin_map_isp_pad function.
>>>> - Dropped unused variables.
>>>>
>>>>   v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230331121826.96973-1-jack.zhu@starfivetech.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> From the current review status, the patches related to the CSI module
>>> have 'reviewed-by' tags. I would like to know if it is okay to add
>>> patches 1-5 from this series to a PR first.
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>> 
>> Hello Mauro, Laurent, Maxime, Rob, Krzysztof, Robert, Todor and Philipp,
>> 
>> Can you give me some suggestions and comments on the previous request
>> to commit CSI related patches first? Thank you for your time.
> 
> You received very specific feedback, so know you decided to ignore it?
> 
> No, implement what you were asked for.
> 

Hi Krzysztof,

Thank you for your comments.

I am talking about CSI-related patches 1-5, not including the patches
6-8. The CSI module is a relatively functionally independent hardware
module. The CSI-related patches 1-5 already have 'reviewed-by' tags,
and there are no unprocessed comments left. So, made the previous
request. Please let me know if I understand something wrong.

I don't want to ignore any comments, I will continue to modify the isp
patches 6-8 in subsequent versions according to your comments. The
ISP-related patches are being prepared.

Jack

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>