From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Wandun <chenwandun1@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
Oreoluwa Babatunde <oreoluwa.babatunde@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of: reserved_mem: allocate and map the reserved_mem array early
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 13:27:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81d6c6be-d03b-4fa8-be30-1425c4d1ad40@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8ac6daa-e721-4cba-bef3-3333643db23d@gmail.com>
On 09.10.2026 04:16, Wandun wrote:
> On 10/8/26 23:24, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Get rid of the static, limited-size reserved_mem array and replace it
>> with array allocated by memblock_alloc_raw() and accessed through a
>> temporary early_memremap() mapping. Such mapping is needed for some
>> architectures (like ARM64), where linear map is not yet available during
>> early boot scan. Having a single, writeable array with all reserved
>> regions removes the need to perform two step initialization introduced
>> by commit 8a6e02d0c00e ("of: reserved_mem: Restructure how the reserved
>> memory regions are processed"), so all regions can be processed
>> directly during the early scan again.
> One concern about the ordering here: the new memblock_alloc_raw() for the
> reserved_mem array runs *before* the static ("reg") regions are reserved,
> so the array can be allocated from inside one of them which makes the
> subsequent static region reservation fail.
Well, that's what Sashiko already reported. It will be trivial to process
'static' regions before doing the reserved_mem allocation, but this in turn
returns us to the point of not being able to handle their reservation
failures. I wonder what's worse...
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20261008152449eucas1p29758be26c325084093c14cfa9b8b2d04@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2026-10-08 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] of: reserved_mem: use dynamically allocated reserved_mem array Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-08 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] of: reserved_mem: group allocation helpers together Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-08 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] of: reserved_mem: allocate and map the reserved_mem array early Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-08 15:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 2:16 ` Wandun
2026-10-09 11:27 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2026-10-09 5:20 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81d6c6be-d03b-4fa8-be30-1425c4d1ad40@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oreoluwa.babatunde@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox