From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] arm64: Add architecture support for PCI
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:37:51 +0100
Message-ID: <8312584.jdZZuHGAjg@wuerfel>
References: <1394811258-1500-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20140319135619.GC6231@localhost> <20140319172140.GA16328@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140319172140.GA16328@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> 
> My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of the functions that
> I've added into arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c I don't think we can get away without having that
> file, or at least not in the first phase if we want speedy integration into mainline.

Let me simplify the discussion here:

NAK to adding yet another architecture specific implementation.

	Arnd