Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: dts: freescale: apalis-imx8: fix reserved-memory node names

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 18/01/2023 15:36, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 15:02 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/01/2023 08:26, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
>>> From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
>>>
>>> Fix reserved-memory node names using dashes rather than underscores.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - New patch fixing reserved-memory node names.
>>>
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-
>>> apalis-v1.1.dtsi
>>> index 70c00b92cb05..6217e0a48f96 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
>>> @@ -133,17 +133,17 @@ reserved-memory {
>>>                 #size-cells = <2>;
>>>                 ranges;
>>>  
>>> -               decoder_boot: decoder_boot@84000000 {
>>> +               decoder_boot: decoder-boot@84000000 {
>>
>> This is ridiculous. You just added it! If we consider original code as
>> wrong, then you intentionally added wrong code just to fix it.
>>
>> No, that's not the way how it should be developed.
> 
> Shawn asked me to ease the review process which is exactly what I did.

Any reason why b4 diff cannot be used? If your patchset fails b4
auto-detection of version, this should be fixed instead of fake split.

Best regards,
Krzysztof