From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC211DFE1; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 22:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726526328; cv=none; b=Cocv9Pj/UEQ+hX22WEv3QCqcMU2SvG8sTr8QsWA4WWq11zsOjRLCNR34Vb/DN67jJEkBd3b9uHZl99cB1n2/PP4OpJj7DixCntYzZ0Y2+vsnc9z6tDegJv8dGxYPWQ7rfQNTd5XbH+NuDNGewQ7tGJNgJVEHsx0qnYmP7HS9N10= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726526328; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YbAYe0oOBAtRgDdUM6HGKye8GRVg1ONRWGQevcTax+4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NRyE6hex3Ou+aWPKrZLyqzoj/zIaU8Q86J9dnQeLx63GxVcjK2U7guAtGexdjkI1NGxQUqQ0YnTQQVryE0pvhVA8RV4XhAWJ4pqral529jyfZ/YTDzDl7KGTq82vWWE0A1DKwXukMc56AHGNCMPRIPqkrMmrIRJ5lQMZXJsNoy4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=k0zO8q7S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="k0zO8q7S" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zFh+9m6bFt3yYPy5J3eOxOrUjNZGpq4euBHAABmwVps=; b=k0zO8q7SKxTLeYly004Mi7yqY3 glGoj/l8uUO8qwaZmuBCnf3/NFouVzClQcl6FTauS3dwHQoDqKl5tkGVNS0V/GSumMVCOhOis4A0S 3Ko82rO0PR3BBecXgQCGvBY0HrmYVPp8AYeA9956gOSETARzKRuK/Bke5wNIs9A5SaBgVpWZfMhiz yceYTgliTGaepu0/VcmFDV7Szm3UCmwyQBRVOKgUjcr1BYg34BYjOfDGyz+er6xe20QmPB5uLi015 4HuuRINmzNF2c9vI6M42Q22lCDsZGx+3pOGZL2ZGXbkkPx0ju4P0f76I2KqnOThn0gkUn+U2oLt+e offU7DUA==; Received: from [213.164.25.30] (helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sqKMa-0003Pj-Mf; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:38:32 +0200 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Karthikeyan Krishnasamy , robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: rtc: microcrystal,rv3028: add #clock-cells property Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:38:30 +0200 Message-ID: <8425812.T7Z3S40VBb@phil> In-Reply-To: <20240916143407734d133c@mail.local> References: <20240912142451.2952633-1-karthikeyan@linumiz.com> <2955009.e9J7NaK4W3@phil> <20240916143407734d133c@mail.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Montag, 16. September 2024, 16:34:07 CEST schrieb Alexandre Belloni: > On 16/09/2024 16:26:23+0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Hi Alexandre, > > > > Am Montag, 16. September 2024, 14:37:56 CEST schrieb Alexandre Belloni: > > > On 12/09/2024 19:54:48+0530, Karthikeyan Krishnasamy wrote: > > > > RV3028 RTC has a clock out features, the clk out can be > > > > controlled using clkout register, to consume the clock out > > > > from rv3028 '#clock-cells' property is added. > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley > > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni > > > > just for my understanding, does this mean that you expect this change > > to get applied together with the others? > > > > No preference, just making sure I understand :-) > > i was actually wondering how this was going to get applied. I guess that > if you are planning to take the rest, you can also apply this one. so we were both wondering the same thing :-) . For some other watchdog binding Guenter suggested the binding patch to go with the rest, so I wanted to make sure your Ack meant the same. But of course I'm also fine/happy with you just picking up this rtc binding patch for the rtc tree :-) Heiko