From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB38F2D61B; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.155 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721226027; cv=none; b=kUONse85Stt/2WcX6TdKYadFSrjYNVGgWUpLvz7w6WsY7PYRzEgIHrhN8n4Gu5Nl/9VvYwWFqyCg7NeLjv5GsQsRM5oGq96K/ZL3n/QGP8niKiOGJb+Q2IFab3oMkbudyrLH4Ec7++PIjdesX2FRUKZaynViCU0aE0tEHimadp4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721226027; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5nbCBW4oJ/ogJooKQCfqvSA1sAQdk3JiwN9/HrQmGuI=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=I6SZMQHxBC5p1Eooh8Pac5q9Cn5EqNKqBdDRK8KTd3dJu5C3fjz3yENxH8vhsk1k459GxFYtHhM/rYj05ww5h95OsixvCyDT5dztQFVoViA07/PeE01ZDw9cRdDPt5hd27soliEh5q8UyNhTtk0CBsRGXrmxwsGYts15p3KNuZg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=flygoat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flygoat.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=flygoat.com header.i=@flygoat.com header.b=R9BkCuK+; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=qy7CO/Wf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.155 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=flygoat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flygoat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=flygoat.com header.i=@flygoat.com header.b="R9BkCuK+"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="qy7CO/Wf" Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7749114010F; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 10:20:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap44 ([10.202.2.94]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Jul 2024 10:20:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=flygoat.com; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1721226023; x=1721312423; bh=5nbCBW4oJ/ogJooKQCfqvSA1sAQdk3JiwN9/HrQmGuI=; b= R9BkCuK+4L4Yhj3OD+PedvswLbb/7Zkt+bFvvGNfk723OwEUliYLbrfqEyM3fDV9 N0W8+7CR4kwY7tv4VRh8FT5km9NZQ8LNGnSmj0PTUyv0yBsnTAN82OIsks7gtmZl cebaAVLHeeDZ8TAv+13S4HrbVelLCKN3OD5OHui4I2xJzpqhu+rlKUrORDvoHJKB hSUspxBvJAEidKIZpCCBgJOywHJqR145nO17Mt2GUIyTN69KY+WMDnFM0AMUHIMO IPXuWxsV/ziPkG8lUWrI8nHywgLKXu103xICKh0jiBmVIkQRkarZ6UWx+BnbcmY2 4U2bflb/aiLUhig/vwWcTQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1721226023; x= 1721312423; bh=5nbCBW4oJ/ogJooKQCfqvSA1sAQdk3JiwN9/HrQmGuI=; b=q y7CO/WfBsjp4/g8CZYUK+FXGkHu7vtx3keyVj1U+OF9ykGcNjrzDmGnpqQ5SDUvD 6jsm6Qhi2WxM0NoVO9SPsuOi1MDfV7Oq6GQNvHj7zOGb4lERi+SKffqObY7w+GEc j6NiWyer6h6nYIhoEwLgVXoIQePRYC53jgggoIB/7vm2S/J0553KyygiTN51Ieft dByOBG+nG5jCTvdJ6ZCJaYFVsoCrZEvJYJIAvmP67PKbn7FcBgvxYT5LSQv8uHUT VkP4b+bwOUC8Dai2HltIZMmbUjsMoKnhn4o+pB6C01T2D5rxnmY73rEYOcC7QBZa OTNz3UW8yOGQmN2bl106g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrgeeigdejudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedflfhi rgiguhhnucgjrghnghdfuceojhhirgiguhhnrdihrghnghesfhhlhihgohgrthdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudefgeeftedugeehffdtheefgfevffelfefghefhjeeu geevtefhudduvdeihefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepjhhirgiguhhnrdihrghnghesfhhlhihgohgrthdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ifd894703:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8E52E36A0074; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 10:20:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-568-g843fbadbe-fm-20240701.003-g843fbadb Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <84d2591b-4336-453f-bcb2-a7c47df0574c@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240711-loongson1-dma-v9-0-5ce8b5e85a56@gmail.com> <54d9edd5-377e-4d9a-956f-8f2ba49d4295@app.fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:20:01 +0800 From: "Jiaxun Yang" To: "Huacai Chen" Cc: "Kelvin Cheung" , "Vinod Koul" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Conor Dooley" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v9 0/2] Add support for Loongson1 APB DMA Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E5=9C=A82024=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=8817=E6=97=A5=E4=B8=83=E6=9C=88 =E4=B8=8B=E5= =8D=889:06=EF=BC=8CHuacai Chen=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 9:12=E2=80=AFPM Jiaxun Yang wrote: >> >> >> >> =E5=9C=A82024=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=8816=E6=97=A5=E4=B8=83=E6=9C=88 =E4=B8=8B= =E5=8D=885:40=EF=BC=8CHuacai Chen=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 3:00=E2=80=AFPM Jiaxun Yang wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> =E5=9C=A82024=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=8815=E6=97=A5=E4=B8=83=E6=9C=88 =E4=B8= =8B=E5=8D=882:39=EF=BC=8CHuacai Chen=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> >> [...] >> >> > >> >> >> You said that you've accepted my suggestion, which means you re= cognize >> >> >> 'loongson' as the better name for the drivers. >> >> > No, I don't think so, this is just a compromise to keep consiste= ncy. >> >> >> >> Folks, can we settle on this topic? >> >> >> >> Is this naming really important? As long as people can read actual= chip name from >> >> kernel code & documents, I think both are acceptable. >> >> >> >> I suggest let this patch go as is. And if anyone want to unify the= naming, they can >> >> propose a treewide patch. >> > Renaming still breaks config files. >> >> This is trival with treewide sed :-) > Please read the commit message of b8d3349803ba34afda429e87a837fd95a ca= refully. We don't have 114 defconfigs don't we? Those symbols are not frequently specified by down stream users either. I think Keguang had tried his best on resolving all reasonable comments. Naming is a matter of preference after all, I think we should give Kegua= ng some respect here. Thanks - Jiaxun > > Huacai > >> >> Thanks >> - Jiaxun >> >> -- >> - Jiaxun --=20 - Jiaxun