From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C092188596; Sun, 3 May 2026 02:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777776651; cv=none; b=BX8PJPikOSSH7WygIQKDiKNXXB7BfgBLehaPLcVX7N2BMQzv90643xxcq/qeZd/2hotMkHhI9qqhn3Cy8EwtliU5/XL/SRiuDpgq1CWWFth4QaXa+/Gic6P58HRFUs9TBLaeIJ58Y+hStOyXEmlfn8swEHjwacS4Ad9TeQRyR2M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777776651; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1FjViA5hvJyZ/LsmIK7ksV+Cft1GjoD3Thb5jztjDco=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=L/LmGt3yrIZ3WrdwaukkGzgZPga/mXxqTjjtRQWdwGTzB6tb1hTddBFPJW7J2cvaWh3NUmIF8Q29R4E2MdNfY330MmP2B02PbG1TL4GkXfnZ69PrjuAeWHGqhutRcaHmmpD69o1paRrcja+Ojo+ECYhnF/VlBQs8FyyvQeo+1CM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=khdl8CnH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="khdl8CnH" Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [10.196.197.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g7TmP5BtLz9tjP; Sun, 3 May 2026 04:50:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1777776645; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=d1A1qyP8QeOPCU1K/hsX1FmZmqrWn214Zp6AIo4nhBs=; b=khdl8CnHDmq8rAwn3UDgffvBS7llbtM4SCECCpjOR0ezbfjH17+dLJReJmvcKjc+UoOKGA RU3Z5xmkgQ3EoXJ8P1d+KjiiNYxCDEMTnsGK0BVWbBmRpi3lRxIkgHVYBx21GvhOhA71Lp t/UpvNPk7kWBDD1UDbXF7kszEoDs7pf83TpH/2zYg+fNcnh8TMcZOgXyQ28KDCUyXqDOvR 8KaU9ZRoY/dTXZiwhyGmq1MKzmLi6C5ecTzgipWpegH4BMWYCPRoykeViDvgt1zE8Rb/gS 2KAbXg+hCgk5E/4nw/oUmnlmpLfdtfkEme0SzlHq81QefByEtuFmo/MjNBucZg== Message-ID: <8668e3da-fcd2-412e-9457-3413e0aceafc@mailbox.org> Date: Sat, 2 May 2026 21:23:33 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: clock: cs2000-cp: document CS2500 To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley , David Airlie , Kieran Bingham , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Kuninori Morimoto , Laurent Pinchart , Magnus Damm , Maxime Ripard , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Simona Vetter , Stephen Boyd , Thomas Zimmermann , Tomi Valkeinen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20260419193718.133174-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <20260419193718.133174-4-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MBO-RS-ID: 85931d5d9f889a08582 X-MBO-RS-META: i4rmf11wrmk77r1ympywfpfi9bxrssa9 On 4/29/26 1:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On Sun, 19 Apr 2026 at 21:37, Marek Vasut > wrote: >> Document backward compatibility support for CS2500 chip, which >> is a drop-in replacement for CS2000 chip. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > Thanks for your patch! > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/cirrus,cs2000-cp.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/cirrus,cs2000-cp.yaml >> @@ -11,14 +11,18 @@ maintainers: >> >> description: | >> The CS2000-CP is an extremely versatile system clocking device that >> - utilizes a programmable phase lock loop. >> + utilizes a programmable phase lock loop. CP2500-CP is a compatible >> + drop-in replacement for CP2000-CP. > > While CP2000 exists in two variants (-CP and -OTP, cfr. the link below), > there is just "CP2500"[2]. And it is called CS2500 , suffix dropped and typo fixed in V2, thanks !