From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com, dimitrysh@google.com,
john.stultz@linaro.org, nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org,
loic.poulain@linaro.org
Subject: Re: Revisiting Devicetree Overlay Manager
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:26:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8715b1f9-5e30-a14e-a029-fcc129a09c22@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180425073442.e4pikxonhqr5r7cw@linaro.org>
Hi Manivannan,
Sorry for the delay. I'll try to get to this today or tommorrow.
-Frank
On 04/25/18 00:34, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Did you had time to look into this? Especially I'd like to hear your
> opinion on the first pain point I have mentioned. I can understand
> that the whole point on introducing the of_overlay_fdt_apply() API
> is to remove the duplication of overlay FDT unflattening, but do you have
> any idea of how we can make this API work with overlay nodes appended
> to the base DTB?
>
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:08:04PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I have just started working on the Devicetree Overlay Manager support in
>> kernel. The idea is to merge overlays at boot time specified via some
>> interface like kernel command line. The motivation for this work comes from
>> Overlay Manager [1] submitted by John last year. The mechanism which I have
>> been working on is an extension to John's work. It focusses on addressing
>> Rob's comments on the Overlay Manager which involves having multiple ways
>> to load overlays.
>>
>> Proposal:
>> =========
>>
>> 1. Pass all devicetree overlays via following methods:
>> - Overlays appended to base DTB
>> - Individual overlays built into kernel as firmware blobs
>> - Any other ways?
>>
>> 2. Specify overlays to load via kernel command line as below:
>> - overlay_mgr.overlays=<overlay1,overlay2,...>
>>
>> 3. Merge only the specified overlays during boot time. First look for the
>> overlay in the base DTB. If it is found, just apply it, else defer to firmware
>> load approach.
>>
>> The Overlay Manager code is expected to be very simple and will just do the
>> above mentioned work. Later on, it will be extended to support dynamic
>> modification of overlays from userspace with some additional security
>> features like having a property listed in the base devicetree for only
>> allowing changes to the current node and its child nodes, etc...
>>
>> Pain Points:
>> ============
>>
>> 1. Starting from 4.17 we don't have any API exposed from DT core to merge
>> individual devicetree nodes. We only have of_overlay_fdt_apply() function
>> which takes the whole FDT. This will work very well for the firmware approach
>> since we will pass the overlays blobs but not for overlays appended to base DTB,
>> where we will pass individual overlay nodes.
>>
>> 2. Using firmware load method will force us to have this Overlay Manager code
>> at late_initcall level since firmware class exists only in fs_inticall level,
>> which might be too late for some devices.
>>
>> 3. This whole approach is not expected to work very well (still not yet tested)
>> on DSI based devices since it needs to be present at very early during boot
>> process.
>>
>> The Overlay Manager propsed here will be board agnostic and it should work on
>> all platforms supporting DT. This will be a _very_ useful feature for the
>> development boards such as 96Boards, Raspberry Pi, BBB etc... and also for
>> production ready devices.
>>
>> So, I'd like to hear suggestions/feedbacks for the above mentioned proposal &
>> pain points and hope to land the most awaited feature in kernel.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mani
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/10/20
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 14:38 Revisiting Devicetree Overlay Manager Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-04-25 7:34 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-04-25 17:26 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2018-05-18 3:53 ` Frank Rowand
2018-05-22 19:32 ` Alan Tull
2018-05-22 21:13 ` Frank Rowand
2018-04-25 17:30 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8715b1f9-5e30-a14e-a029-fcc129a09c22@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dimitrysh@google.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).