From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory CLEMENT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add CPU clock support for Armada 7K/8K Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:57:04 +0100 Message-ID: <871s4c5an3.fsf@FE-laptop> References: <20181216094147.6468-1-gregory.clement@bootlin.com> <87a7k8o5d5.fsf@FE-laptop> <154713766177.15366.14948014236046606980@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <875zuwo4fi.fsf@FE-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <875zuwo4fi.fsf@FE-laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Antoine Tenart , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Chevallier , Rob Herring , Thomas Petazzoni , =?utf-8?Q?Miqu=C3=A8l?= Raynal , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On jeu., janv. 10 2019, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On jeu., janv. 10 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> Quoting Gregory CLEMENT (2019-01-10 08:16:22) >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> On dim., déc. 16 2018, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > This is the third version of a series allowing to manage the cpu >>> > clock for Armada 7K/8K. For these SoCs, the CPUs share the same clock >>> > by cluster, so actually the clock management is done at cluster level. >>> > >>> > As for the other Armada 7K/8K clocks it is possible to have multiple >>> > AP so here again we need to have unique name: the purpose of the second >>> > patch is to share a common code which will be used in 3 drivers. >>> > >>> > The last 2 patch enable the driver at dt and platform level and will >>> > be applied through the mvebu subsystem. >>> >>> What is the status of this series? >>> >>> The only comments I had was from Rob about the binding and I answered >>> them 3 weeks ago. Do you have any other comments? Do you expect a rebase >>> of this series on v5.0-rc1? >>> >> >> I'm waiting for Rob. I think the binding is not proper so presumably you >> will figure out what Rob wants and then change the code accordingly and >> resend? > > Actually the binding describes properly the hardware we have and that > what I answered to Rob. I pinged you about this series more than one month ago, and answered Rob concerned 2 months ago! He didn't said anything about my comments so I really think that the binding is OK and described the hardware we have. So could you consider to apply this series? Thanks, Gregory > > Gregory > > -- > Gregory Clement, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://bootlin.com > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- Gregory Clement, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com