From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn@codeaurora.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
kalyan_t@codeaurora.org,
"Kristian H . Kristensen" <hoegsberg@chromium.org>,
mka@chromium.org, devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2] drm/msm: add shutdown support for display platform_driver
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 21:40:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8742ac6fbd498fdc22dcd469c3a2d52a@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvgo50b+m2+onak=AZfgihkBXEP9POjMR52087v==-puLdkQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Emil,
On 2020-06-02 21:09, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 15:49, Sai Prakash Ranjan
> <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Emil,
>>
>> On 2020-06-02 19:43, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > Hi Krishna,
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 08:17, Krishna Manikandan
>> > <mkrishn@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Define shutdown callback for display drm driver,
>> >> so as to disable all the CRTCS when shutdown
>> >> notification is received by the driver.
>> >>
>> >> This change will turn off the timing engine so
>> >> that no display transactions are requested
>> >> while mmu translations are getting disabled
>> >> during reboot sequence.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn@codeaurora.org>
>> >>
>> > AFAICT atomics is setup in msm_drm_ops::bind and shutdown in
>> > msm_drm_ops::unbind.
>> >
>> > Are you saying that unbind never triggers? If so, then we should
>> > really fix that instead, since this patch seems more like a
>> > workaround.
>> >
>>
>> Which path do you suppose that the unbind should be called from,
>> remove
>> callback? Here we are talking about the drivers which are builtin,
>> where
>> remove callbacks are not called from the driver core during
>> reboot/shutdown,
>> instead shutdown callbacks are called which needs to be defined in
>> order
>> to
>> trigger unbind. So AFAICS there is nothing to be fixed.
>>
> Interesting - in drm effectively only drm panels implement .shutdown.
> So my naive assumption was that .remove was used implicitly by core,
> as part of the shutdown process. Yet that's not the case, so it seems
> that many drivers could use some fixes.
>
> Then again, that's an existing problem which is irrelevant for msm.
> -Emil
To give more context, we are actually targeting the clients/consumers
of SMMU/IOMMU here because we have to make sure that before the supplier
(SMMU) shuts down, its consumers/clients need to be shutdown properly.
Now the ordering of this is taken care in the SMMU driver via
device_link
which makes sure that consumer shutdown callbacks are called first, but
we
need to define shutdown callbacks for all its consumers to make sure we
actually shutdown the clients or else it would invite the crashes during
reboot
which in this case was seen for display.
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-02 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 11:03 [v2] drm/msm: add shutdown support for display platform_driver Krishna Manikandan
2020-06-02 14:13 ` Emil Velikov
2020-06-02 14:49 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-02 15:39 ` Emil Velikov
2020-06-02 16:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2020-06-05 14:11 ` Emil Velikov
2020-08-18 10:03 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-08-18 15:12 ` Rob Clark
2020-08-18 15:18 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8742ac6fbd498fdc22dcd469c3a2d52a@codeaurora.org \
--to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hoegsberg@chromium.org \
--cc=kalyan_t@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=mkrishn@codeaurora.org \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).