From: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "Alex Lanzano" <lanzano.alex@gmail.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Derek J . Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
"Philip Müller" <philm@manjaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Provide chip info as configuration structure
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:49:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xpnbyyn.fsf@justinweiss.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241019123339.155c046c@jic23-huawei> (Jonathan Cameron's message of "Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:33:39 +0100")
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> writes:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:36:08 -0700
> Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com> wrote:
>
>> Prepare the bmi270 driver to support similar devices like the bmi260.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
> One thing in here. The enum ID thing tends to end up costing more than
> the benefit it brings, so for newer drivers preferred option is separate
> structure instances rather than an array.
That makes sense to me, even considering your comments on patch #4. I'll
switch to separate structures here and keep the if / else in that later
patch.
Justin
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> index 8ac20ad7ee94..2e8d85a4e419 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> @@ -10,10 +10,23 @@ struct device;
>> struct bmi270_data {
>> struct device *dev;
>> struct regmap *regmap;
>> + const struct bmi270_chip_info *chip_info;
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum bmi270_device_type {
>> + BMI270,
>
> Whilst quite a few drivers do it this way, over time we've found that it's
> much easier to just skip the array of structures and have independent ones.
> Increase the extern lines to one per supported device, but removes
> need for an enum here and generally gives slightly more readable code.
>
>
>> +};
>
>> };
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "bosch,bmi270" },
>> + { .compatible = "bosch,bmi270", .data = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI270] },
>
> After dropping the enum this just becomes &bmi270_chip_info
> and later you'll add bmi260_chip_info etc.
>
>> { }
>> };
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-19 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-18 23:36 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add i2c driver for Bosch BMI260 IMU Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Use INFO_SAMP_FREQ instead of INFO_FREQUENCY Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:48 ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Provide chip info as configuration structure Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:49 ` Justin Weiss [this message]
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: iio: imu: Add Bosch BMI260 Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:49 ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add support for BMI260 Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52 ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-20 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add triggered buffer for Bosch BMI270 IMU Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52 ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add scale and sampling frequency to " Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52 ` Justin Weiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xpnbyyn.fsf@justinweiss.com \
--to=justin@justinweiss.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lanzano.alex@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philm@manjaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).