devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "Alex Lanzano" <lanzano.alex@gmail.com>,
	"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Derek J . Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
	"Philip Müller" <philm@manjaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Provide chip info as configuration structure
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:49:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xpnbyyn.fsf@justinweiss.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241019123339.155c046c@jic23-huawei> (Jonathan Cameron's message of "Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:33:39 +0100")

Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> writes:

> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:36:08 -0700
> Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com> wrote:
>
>> Prepare the bmi270 driver to support similar devices like the bmi260.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
> One thing in here.  The enum ID thing tends to end up costing more than
> the benefit it brings, so for newer drivers preferred option is separate
> structure instances rather than an array.

That makes sense to me, even considering your comments on patch #4. I'll
switch to separate structures here and keep the if / else in that later
patch.

Justin

>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h      | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>  drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>>  drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c  | 11 ++++++++---
>>  drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c  | 11 ++++++++---
>>  4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> index 8ac20ad7ee94..2e8d85a4e419 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> @@ -10,10 +10,23 @@ struct device;
>>  struct bmi270_data {
>>  	struct device *dev;
>>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>> +	const struct bmi270_chip_info *chip_info;
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum bmi270_device_type {
>> +	BMI270,
>
> Whilst quite a few drivers do it this way, over time we've found that it's
> much easier to just skip the array of structures and have independent ones.
> Increase the extern lines to one per supported device, but removes
> need for an enum here and generally gives slightly more readable code.
>
>
>> +};
>
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
>> -	{ .compatible = "bosch,bmi270" },
>> +	{ .compatible = "bosch,bmi270", .data = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI270] },
>
> After dropping the enum this just becomes &bmi270_chip_info
> and later you'll add bmi260_chip_info etc.
>
>>  	{ }
>>  };
>>  

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-19 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-18 23:36 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add i2c driver for Bosch BMI260 IMU Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Use INFO_SAMP_FREQ instead of INFO_FREQUENCY Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:48     ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Provide chip info as configuration structure Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:49     ` Justin Weiss [this message]
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: iio: imu: Add Bosch BMI260 Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:36   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:49     ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add support for BMI260 Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:40   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52     ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-20 11:00       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add triggered buffer for Bosch BMI270 IMU Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:41   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52     ` Justin Weiss
2024-10-18 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: imu: bmi270: Add scale and sampling frequency to " Justin Weiss
2024-10-19 11:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-19 20:52     ` Justin Weiss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875xpnbyyn.fsf@justinweiss.com \
    --to=justin@justinweiss.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lanzano.alex@gmail.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philm@manjaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).