From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:53:26 +0300 Message-ID: <8760bk1t1l.fsf@linux.intel.com> References: <1503930018-536-1-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <878tgim24i.fsf@linux.intel.com> <04a49088-b615-d7b8-0387-e7bfa32ee19f@st.com> <87vajllx8t.fsf@linux.intel.com> <1c4180ef-2da6-b420-7c6e-41769608384a@st.com> <87sheplsrm.fsf@linux.intel.com> <3c36db6d-75fd-1be6-e946-b75a04e3760e@st.com> <21df4d0c-075c-0c5a-c39b-b1dd94fe819d@st.com> <87efq821tz.fsf@linux.intel.com> <878tgg1t5a.fsf@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <878tgg1t5a.fsf@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Torgue , Amelie DELAUNAY , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , John Youn Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Benjamin GAIGNARD List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, Felipe Balbi writes: >>>> I thought that patches 1 and 2, as they are "driver" patches, had to be >>>> applied on USB tree (so Felipe's one), and the others (3 to 7) had to be >>>> applied on STM32-DT tree (Alex's one). Did I miss something? >>> >>> patch 1 is documentation, right? Without the documentation patch, >>> checkpatch will cringe :-) So either way works. >>> >>> If you insist, I can take 1-2 through my tree. No worries. >> >> I don't want to insist :) but for me it is better (and more safe) if you >> take patch 1&2 in your tree, and will take others in mine. > > Okay, I'll apply 1&2 they are now in my testing/next and next branches. -- balbi