From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E06F4F1; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737646529; cv=none; b=rE+Eijqk3UbLxmkPtnrJi6FOfeGBvVgpSImJ1Env9LwBB6eq6Rfql2nd7ACHXAYjcnHCY1F5t2BZt7Nbv8nePdGLp5/YvJ0GZuRmY6OTjg9HwVKvTNhleAJrmCTMinaDo+FMXkAkaa3prl8XdWdyJFU6XFDu8GQbi+jYEtOcFjg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737646529; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w9SZ7HUYSlo0eJUNl5wTyCKYp8PXHdw4bohPhRTsshY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ldQNlGaidmqS4LZeWX5pfhUsiKT2oYBMG2Zz7CQ6PYlLq4wAzF/OapPlmBUepNhFWULrQ5Qor36MKgsZVhe+BgQwynn8otzhqh/BVFpvFtToGaRBnk+oye8LnHYpILU4tmSpOF47FapGWzN9ci7sZszTqfzZKOpAmCFbGHA30fo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=lXpzLkBG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="lXpzLkBG" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCD021BF20B; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:35:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1737646525; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=w9SZ7HUYSlo0eJUNl5wTyCKYp8PXHdw4bohPhRTsshY=; b=lXpzLkBG3Rff9P5hfTkWyIDlDr35xdzmvGVJxpHkFxkfLNaCw2BC+WcjoSu6PKBPkPT7X+ oxyB7G15RoZIc77/dK6xY0TYfoJG6LRL23UggKPx95dEtpqUiciKJwm3qxSvdeW4mIhLrx z6DQ3k4YQ2Dv9DiAvVLBCvXU6U3rjyc4kx7RAZ+6slMb54vxCcTdoBSkzxA3ATJfeVfpVf x5VjUT1F6wUnr07ZH7tpT7TW4x6fUiVVEfAVL73FaAhTZQNNkxQ3MFHIW+rHCIYMrBnJxZ HPaJMFAvZAK2AXtp4xuQkEnKp1RTwlMu1BJcqEcV3hSMEdFvvj+97bBngI3RXQ== From: Gregory CLEMENT To: Aleksandar Rikalo Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Vladimir Kondratiev , Theo Lebrun , Arnd Bergmann , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Djordje Todorovic , Chao-ying Fu , Daniel Lezcano , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Hauke Mehrtens , Ilya Lipnitskiy , Jiaxun Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Paul Burton , Peter Zijlstra , Serge Semin , Tiezhu Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/13] MIPS: Support I6500 multi-cluster configuration In-Reply-To: References: <20241028175935.51250-1-arikalo@gmail.com> <87ed0uvqf7.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 16:35:23 +0100 Message-ID: <877c6lv8zo.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: gregory.clement@bootlin.com Hello Aleksandar, > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:06=E2=80=AFPM Gregory CLEMENT > wrote: >> >> Hello Aleksandar, >> >> > Taken from Paul Burton MIPS repo with minor changes from Chao-ying Fu. >> > Tested with 64r6el_defconfig on Boston board in 2 cluster/2 VPU and >> > 1 cluster/4 VPU configurations. >> >> I tested your series on top of v6.13, with some patches already >> merged. Only the patch "[PATCH v8 09/13] MIPS: CPS: Boot CPUs in >> secondary clusters" encountered a merge issue. You can review the fixed >> version I created as an attachment. >> >> With the v2 series I sent a few days ago, cluster support continued to >> work on EyeQ5 and EyeQ6. However, for specific needs requiring support >> of EyeQ6, I will send a new version that takes into account the feedback >> received. >> >> Gregory > > Hello Gregory, > > Thank you for your time. > > I agree with the change in the attachment. Will you send it to the > list or should I do it as a v9 version of the series? I will let you send a v9 version. Feel free to merge my series [1] with yours, as some of my patches depend on your series. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250123-cluster-hci-broken-v3-0-8a7ec57c= bf68@bootlin.com/ Thanks, Gregory --=20 Gr=C3=A9gory CLEMENT, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com