From: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mat.jonczyk@o2.pl,
dlan@gentoo.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, troymitchell988@gmail.com,
guodong@riscstar.com, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/8] mfd: simple-mfd-i2c: specify max_register
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 07:42:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dcf99-107e-4d96-8790-6608976d13ca@riscstar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250723095125.GR11056@google.com>
On 7/23/25 4:51 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2025, Alex Elder wrote:
>
>> All devices supported by simple MFD use the same 8-bit register 8-bit
>> value regmap configuration. There is an option available for a device
>> to specify a custom configuration, but no existing device uses it.
>>
>> Rather than specify a "full" regmap configuration to change only
>> the max_register value, Lee Jones suggested allowing max_register
>> to be specified in the simple_mfd_data structure. If regmap_config
>> and max_register are both supplied, the max_register field is ignored.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
>> Suggested-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> v8: - Use regmap_config_8r_8v, modifying it if max_register supplied
>>
>> drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.c | 8 ++++++--
>> drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.h | 3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.c
>> index 22159913bea03..5138aa72140b5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.c
>> @@ -24,15 +24,16 @@
>>
>> #include "simple-mfd-i2c.h"
>>
>> -static const struct regmap_config regmap_config_8r_8v = {
>> +static struct regmap_config regmap_config_8r_8v = {
>> .reg_bits = 8,
>> .val_bits = 8,
>> + /* .max_register can be specified in simple_mfd_data */
>
> Drop this comment please.
>
>> };
>>
>> static int simple_mfd_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>> {
>> const struct simple_mfd_data *simple_mfd_data;
>> - const struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
>> + struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
>> struct regmap *regmap;
>> int ret;
>>
>> @@ -43,8 +44,11 @@ static int simple_mfd_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>> regmap_config = ®map_config_8r_8v;
>> else
>> regmap_config = simple_mfd_data->regmap_config;
>> + if (simple_mfd_data && !simple_mfd_data->regmap_config)
>> + regmap_config->max_register = simple_mfd_data->max_register;
>
> If max_register is set in simple_mfd_data, it should take precedence.
I don't really agree with that. If simple_mfd_data->regmap_config
is provided, why not use the max_register field already available
there?
This is why I said above that I think this feature doesn't add
much value. It provides a second way to specify something, but
in the end it complicates the code more than it's worth.
The only time this new simple_mfd_data->max_register field seems
to make sense is if it were the only thing provided (without
simple_mfd_data->regmap_config being supplied). In that case,
I see the benefit--a null simple_mfd_data->regmap_config means
use regmap_config_8r_8v, and overlay it with the max_register
value. The new max_register field avoids defining another huge
but mostly empty regmap_config structure.
Anyway, back to your original point: I said in v7 "If both
are specified, the max_register value is ignored" and I think
that's the simplest. Specify one or the other--if you want
to define things in regmap_config, then that's where you add
your max_register. If you like regmap_config_8r_8v but want
to define a max_register value, just provide max_register.
If you insist, I'll do what you say but before I sent another
version I wanted to explain my reasoning.
> if (simple_mfd_data && simple_mfd_data->max_register)
> regmap_config->max_register = simple_mfd_data->max_register;
>
>> regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, regmap_config);
>> + regmap_config->max_register = 0;
>
> Does max_register definitely have persistence over subsequent calls?
It is a global variable. Isn't that how they work? When
it was read-only there was no concern about that, nor about
any possible concurrent access (though I don't think multiple
probes can be using this code at once).
We could allocate a new one each time instead.
I think what I offered in v5 was acceptable. If you're
willing to accept that I will be happy to keep discussing
(and implementing) the max_register feature.
-Alex
>
>> if (IS_ERR(regmap))
>> return PTR_ERR(regmap);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.h b/drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.h
>> index 7cb2bdd347d97..ea2a96af8bce4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.h
>> @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@
>> #include <linux/regmap.h>
>>
>> struct simple_mfd_data {
>> - const struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
>> + struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
>> + unsigned int max_register; /* Ignored if regmap_config supplied */
>> const struct mfd_cell *mfd_cell;
>> size_t mfd_cell_size;
>> };
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-23 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 17:50 [PATCH v8 0/8] spacemit: introduce P1 PMIC support Alex Elder
2025-07-10 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] dt-bindings: mfd: add support the SpacemiT P1 PMIC Alex Elder
2025-07-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] mfd: simple-mfd-i2c: specify max_register Alex Elder
2025-07-23 9:51 ` Lee Jones
2025-07-23 12:42 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2025-07-24 10:14 ` Lee Jones
2025-07-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] mfd: simple-mfd-i2c: add SpacemiT P1 support Alex Elder
2025-07-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] regulator: spacemit: support SpacemiT P1 regulators Alex Elder
2025-07-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] rtc: spacemit: support the SpacemiT P1 RTC Alex Elder
2025-07-23 21:39 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-07-23 23:37 ` Alex Elder
2025-07-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] riscv: dts: spacemit: enable the i2c8 adapter Alex Elder
2025-07-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] riscv: dts: spacemit: define fixed regulators Alex Elder
2025-07-10 17:51 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] riscv: dts: spacemit: define regulator constraints Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dcf99-107e-4d96-8790-6608976d13ca@riscstar.com \
--to=elder@riscstar.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlan@gentoo.org \
--cc=guodong@riscstar.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=troymitchell988@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox