From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C424C55178 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430382087E for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727362AbgKFNEN (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:04:13 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:42741 "EHLO relay7-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726939AbgKFNEN (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:04:13 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 91.175.115.186 Received: from localhost (91-175-115-186.subs.proxad.net [91.175.115.186]) (Authenticated sender: gregory.clement@bootlin.com) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57EBF2000E; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:04:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Gregory CLEMENT To: Alexandre Belloni , Microchip Linux Driver Support , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Lars Povlsen , Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: mips: Add luton In-Reply-To: <20201106100849.969240-2-gregory.clement@bootlin.com> References: <20201106100849.969240-1-gregory.clement@bootlin.com> <20201106100849.969240-2-gregory.clement@bootlin.com> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 14:04:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6vu8wms.fsf@BL-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello This patch is a leftover, the correct one is the other one. Actually the only difference is using "Luton" instead of "luton" in the topic. Gregory Gregory CLEMENT writes: > Luton SoCs belongs to the same family as Ocelot. > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt > index bc817e984628..cc93fd302553 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Boards with a SoC of the Microsemi MIPS family shall have the following > properties: > > Required properties: > -- compatible: "mscc,ocelot" > +- compatible: "mscc,ocelot" or "mscc,luton" > > > * Other peripherals: > -- > 2.28.0 > -- Gregory Clement, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com