From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
andersson@kernel.org
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:32:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87af9f78-c1dc-0bb0-870b-c2d6055d828f@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215070400.5901-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
On 15.02.2023 08:03, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a follow-up of [1], this series adds support for supplying clock from
> cpufreq node to CPUs for rest of the SoCs.
>
> This series has been tested on SDM845, SM8450 and SC8280XP based boards.
>
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221117053145.10409-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org/
Maybe it would be beneficial to mark '#clock-cells' required in
bindings now, to prevent people from hitting that OPP bug?
Konrad
>
> Manivannan Sadhasivam (12):
> arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm6375: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi | 5 +++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6375.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> 12 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-16 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 7:03 [RESEND PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:33 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 02/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:34 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 03/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:36 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 05/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 06/12] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 07/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 08/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 09/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:39 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 10/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:39 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:03 ` [RESEND PATCH 11/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6375: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:40 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-15 7:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 10:40 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-16 10:32 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2023-03-15 23:35 ` [RESEND PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: " Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87af9f78-c1dc-0bb0-870b-c2d6055d828f@linaro.org \
--to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).