From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-244108.protonmail.ch (mail-244108.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A482B35C6BA for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2026 07:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.224.244.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786089447; cv=none; b=ovJRo75IeVeCF7vLjqD2P/iZEzR6omhuC1kx0hbYWrMAAGD6+86gqWrPaUpeW4tIb21cXYX9P0ft11JAt66Gf5L2+tUYExA6HVErAx6WHt3AkCoSwF0BKDtRTRWlwyWB+Sldp+U6KjLWpPLzHClL+wxS3Qj2AqWeqADZ+3MKXMg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786089447; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cGL3Am/dpGjkP0UgvffaB5WNP5I0zU57WnkGcSi+68U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rQMlqe8WhpHxE9JsJ5zMrmIP6X+jUXoj4rVq02Aw66IqJ7lG4Lb2eeuWB59ItNPI/NRhv/EBT8do5HMUpzkG4NKy0qbczVvUEhjaxo+++z2CpT6FIszNnQLJYa5axtSQT4Zw7Yq06n7kV/Ma4R4A6f9yZylK2PZmh73SzqQcCAg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=geanix.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=geanix.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=geanix.com header.i=@geanix.com header.b=LslJ6cNi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.224.244.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=geanix.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=geanix.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=geanix.com header.i=@geanix.com header.b="LslJ6cNi" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=geanix.com; s=protonmail3; t=1786089441; x=1786348641; bh=zqv8zJFvmVPbjP9s76gjZ7fUWAcpJyUHyf2MwhE8bqU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:From:To: Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=LslJ6cNiS8hzkcA8CH7dZ+gmk0YZerDJa8hic6QR6la8e6wcZBd1o4cqIFITIhYli GGwM1J0335Rdy4YgJgObJ6KXIugWxFSlGCxeHvCL0U4It2VHLzDH1UIxZK1UmtGXsV fzKXrqecEs2eibsKlqaDW8D8AytC5sxT2zBGR7QXRP91pGLIchnsdnRbYTIY48jTiR 8qb47aGrPBMHUr2WI3OcnRRFzGhX2OFBISolaLHOIvoYjQE8yFM3vcZNOI1fYaMiWp b+1SZmTNP9LGzlHJSXWloxjqLwHfNz+wZbMHm36LUg6asfeaDh4peUb9aaXjgdZTw+ kefcNeh+QKB4A== X-Pm-Submission-Id: 4hGc1p5FH7z1DDWf From: Esben Haabendal To: "Andy Shevchenko" Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" , "David Lechner" , Nuno =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A1?= , "Andy Shevchenko" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Nikita Travkin" , "Maslov Dmitry" , "Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan" , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] iio: light: ltr501: Fix sorting order of device arrays In-Reply-To: (Andy Shevchenko's message of "Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:39:53 +0300") References: <20260804-liteon-ltr329-v3-0-c6b768c7c745@geanix.com> <20260804-liteon-ltr329-v3-6-c6b768c7c745@geanix.com> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:57:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87ecgaxt0i.fsf@geanix.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Andy Shevchenko" writes: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 07:02:17PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> Using alphanumerical sort order for these should help reduce merge >> conflicts. > > ... > >> enum { >> - ltr501 = 0, >> - ltr559, >> - ltr301, > >> + ltr301 = 0, > > Is the 0 required? Why? As for the code produced, it should not make any difference. I assume it was put here for improved code readability, and I did not see any reason to change that. I don't care about it myself, so will be happy to remove it if that is the preferred style now. >> ltr303, >> ltr329, >> + ltr501, >> + ltr559, >> }; /Esben