From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1655A1632EF; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738000347; cv=none; b=qb+n9YL3dw4nfPgbJq43Kl6HlTtv3PKW5HgHsDSolgYEtnsbzqskUMXTwgdi8P2FK/iMjMya0Q9salyGYhuIIZ+zfLXc/ptpf5u2qM2CrJKo+E65BF67uMkhKqyPQBkqSvQUTy4vGe4UAj9PFv8XkL+UOe7rJHuuDLHny8sn+mU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738000347; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lL5um/sMTN4EQBWWgGguD/wCi1CgexKIorUJi08LPXo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A7JR6KQq6SBTL0kY7xwOc6g8uTvHBVil0eGqT492qMxgBNhgmdR4MOT59k67SNAOhm0RgS4NhOcXHZZkEkkVtp9Pfq2kgPZ3mf8pQDoXGtk8nkHrcEJByige1kKtKQuvO3ry7rrs9eUmAQsCk/qW7E9j6yYMzBLsjjABUFW9LD0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=iJqw0Y/I; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=VFGL8DfT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="iJqw0Y/I"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="VFGL8DfT" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1738000344; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TOlQGAOrFNEkdLS0RWXAijH0T2zahF0AUY6O5HkV56U=; b=iJqw0Y/ISbwn6iZ+5Asg5nc8WdREWNtcRf0RX6tK26ZEzj7vdEd70HMF3JhU+kEdjLR1Jl coTVpiF9pctggg7wIxgOXKoGlPWWNsOpfFtjqf7ozwPw5YGUAV/uhRdU3NPEKx6aZWEiaa i0Okvfse8KwVtd4dbd2EswJ1xXVT8a36W+z98fIHmuadfbAeG26XymgMZLhjCojSrhBWZ5 q+9vERIYrYf57BvWzl+xR7koza2s/+69cqmyRoK1LOMLgUEBZvUgFDJYwPQYPv3RqL7TbK j3XNAYpQOPbMl+3BXKFkKJKxjTTozo7zkHkZWkkPa4/VJeuslqqhW3CnGdw9Rw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1738000344; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TOlQGAOrFNEkdLS0RWXAijH0T2zahF0AUY6O5HkV56U=; b=VFGL8DfTCdjujN4Ijpccci2cB2onhOkb3QVnd7xcTSPXNbKCs5gGr4FnSFhU9dp8WAtZWj wg6WGWTG7pvYutDA== To: Vladimir Kondratiev , Rob Herring Cc: Anup Patel , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add risc-v,aplic hart indexes In-Reply-To: References: <20250109113814.3254448-1-vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com> <20250109113814.3254448-2-vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com> <20250110162235.GB2975507-robh@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:52:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87ed0o87qg.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, Jan 12 2025 at 08:38, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: >>> Document optional property "riscv,hart-indexes" > >>That is obvious reading the diff. Why do you need this? > > I say it briefly in the description for the property. > In more details this is described in the other patch comment > - for code that uses this property. > Is it better to repeat more detailed description in this patch > comment as well? Obviously. Each patch has to be self contained and explain what it is about. Thanks, tglx