From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0207CA5E; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742564821; cv=none; b=f978UE5o9ZLVkLmSrQHRAboZfnD473zIlC444QsRb2ziXZAfWoYYzp0hnPsfoRRTKJtv0ORRj0V8DCGzUUnGgskWDLD2qq4pX1su+Uyv3kApmEozHFugB/0PulcrADRsMHaz+gXSFrz7w3PPROPU1bCd52MRbNUVODOhDBy1XbE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742564821; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2bzQ39oJ6FKRT59C+Uimbt2z4p+cGnCUiJQU6Ut1RkE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iFwx1mkm8DhiMVIAl9GpHcIhq5X+9/PnhE5n1XErZTanoTZAbEfaW7yvF9yv1rXjVXatGKlxupFiwlkdG5eg4gW3zZSW3Vek3cxi7AB1i9FwmFmseylfD4j/1csQUctjFGI5Pcxe4EFIyKtHEIE1upxBT6Z1SD3RiF8xmTkPYxc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=JEshP6ni; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="JEshP6ni" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net AFB0541061 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1742564812; bh=2bzQ39oJ6FKRT59C+Uimbt2z4p+cGnCUiJQU6Ut1RkE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=JEshP6ni6yTLpiaYeOas9Jrjng77WDd/fjCMr/gyDDWDqacAJ+YuUA8xDXXFER0bT skcsq4eOugcFKMrAOhAi5bJelZY5jeMWSuiex8mG+kjmeigm/4eb4IX4uDvZ3rhzjb uTPpLNk55qCifj+0RtgKCO8lr13t4OjPqyVdNXdKWcdpjLB8vdRS7mmYjWkYli1QVF T6JGg6nJ5dp6Iys4YrQyveK3B7Qdrjs1qbajVQPpCSuKoxwQMgI28OvBtX2zxUm4cl YmbNWfFdDGyr3sOosFT031TE7EXwH8N3uAYsRNSTCevKWhC1dLLjJq+wYgtYrWpFIA t+cnjbyGdB9jA== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFB0541061; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:46:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Changyuan Lyu Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, anthony.yznaga@oracle.com, arnd@arndb.de, ashish.kalra@amd.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, bp@alien8.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, changyuanl@google.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, graf@amazon.com, hpa@zytor.com, jgowans@amazon.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, krzk@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, luto@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, ptyadav@amazon.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rppt@kernel.org, saravanak@google.com, skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/16] Documentation: add documentation for KHO In-Reply-To: <20250321063356.381646-1-changyuanl@google.com> References: <87wmcj69sg.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20250321063356.381646-1-changyuanl@google.com> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 07:46:51 -0600 Message-ID: <87frj6o5ro.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Changyuan Lyu writes: > However, I think concepts.rst and fdt.rst are not not end-user oriented, > but for kernel developers of other subsystems to use KHO API (I also plan > to include the kernel-doc generated from kernel/kexec_handover.c and > include/linux/kexec_handover.h here in the next version). > Should Documentation/core-api be a better choice? Yes, I think it would be. Thanks, jon