From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73182C4320E for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 04:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6044C60F02 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 04:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231489AbhGZD2L (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jul 2021 23:28:11 -0400 Received: from guitar.tcltek.co.il ([192.115.133.116]:46620 "EHLO mx.tkos.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230321AbhGZD2K (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jul 2021 23:28:10 -0400 Received: from tarshish (unknown [10.0.8.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tkos.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D2A440E57; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:08:24 +0300 (IDT) References: <889aae1b88f120cb6281919d27164a959fbe69d0.1626948070.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <70f0522a9394e9da2f31871442d47f6ad0ff41aa.1626948070.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.1 From: Baruch Siach To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Rob Herring , Thierry Reding , Uwe Kleine-K?nig , Lee Jones , Andy Gross , Balaji Prakash J , Robert Marko , Kathiravan T , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:08:36 +0300 Message-ID: <87h7ghwwcb.fsf@tarshish> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On Sun, Jul 25 2021, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 22 Jul 05:01 CDT 2021, Baruch Siach wrote: >> + clocks: >> + maxItems: 1 >> + >> + clock-names: >> + const: core > > With a single clock, it's nice to skip the -names. I find it nicer and better for forward compatibility with hardware variants the might introduce more clocks. Are there any downsides to -names? Thanks, baruch -- ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -