Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi for RK3568 SoC

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:50:02 +0100,
<cl@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>
> 
> RK3568 is a high-performance and low power quad-core application processor
> designed for personal mobile internet device and AIoT equipment. This patch
> add basic core dtsi file for it.
> 
> We use scmi_clk for cortex-a55 instead of standard ARMCLK, so that
> kernel/uboot/rtos can change cpu clk with the same code in ATF, and we will
> enalbe a special high-performance PLL when high frequency is required. The
> smci_clk code is in ATF, and clkid for cpu is 0, as below:
> 
>     cpu0: cpu@0 {
>         device_type = "cpu";
>         compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>         reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>         clocks = <&scmi_clk 0>;
>     };
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-pinctrl.dtsi     | 3111 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568.dtsi      |  779 +++++
>  2 files changed, 3890 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-pinctrl.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568.dtsi

[...]

> +	gic: interrupt-controller@fd400000 {
> +		compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> +		reg = <0x0 0xfd400000 0 0x10000>, /* GICD */
> +		      <0x0 0xfd460000 0 0xc0000>; /* GICR */

If this SoC has 4 CPUs, that's 4 redistributors. Given that GIC600
doesn't implement VLPIs, that's 128kB per redistributors. Why is GICR
large enough for 6 CPUs here? Is that copy-pasted from another SoC?

> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		interrupt-controller;
> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +		mbi-alias = <0x0 0xfd400000>;
> +		mbi-ranges = <296 24>;
> +		msi-controller;
> +	};

Glad to see that you found some spare SPIs to get MSIs going

However, the whole point of mbi-alias (aka GICA in GIC600) is to be
different from GICD and provide some isolation via an IOMMU.  If I
trust the TRM, if should be at 0xfd10000 in your implementation.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.