From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD788F72; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.51.188.92 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706104108; cv=none; b=pIWFqtIGVbagqLLBDsWitVvKew1nE3Z7KnUEOeJxLhQ5koS+1M4m0T4urDTMYly+qkKZvcA0OYwtKHx1gq+9JRbR8Fl7tLpETuAJfLlXzTJzy68b99QtcZT/Qspmq+arZjc53qYjlCgOn4wxDP0xFTiG1x1c8usEjZ65508RHpo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706104108; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S9+36Hp1IxD1aQEtBPW086OEvAbuOTs2f1zL0QQ3N9A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XGXSj11lF1sft87k1e7GS8zWMf9BRJVcZnBkbp54XohFKkHohf4C6nu7TZOSIlcc7re5gfxZwzhimsTo45HAR43jwModSb/2FWDl9gi+7BQ07qpuX+Ucdm21JdfdSZaNQ11mrgRpCeSseVSz4vnqlMhHvHrv7x9jvjL87w6zxrM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.b=RKbh3WSS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.51.188.92 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.b="RKbh3WSS" Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSdc1-0004B9-G8; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:48:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=S9+36Hp1IxD1aQEtBPW086OEvAbuOTs2f1zL0QQ3N9A=; b=RKbh3WSS0uIakaAG2939 CgNcweAuV9EVLFIf/3+Xp6ag5Iy3O9MOui0jMOitNje0irDmRwiGBYpgGs//eLtbEQTv0nDH1pqFY BMSITC0+RQQeWWhQGR2Mnb++MpPyZbZWGw25CjZFOe8N2q7aXJH3Xzs8cto5u/6Iwv5M7IDXQwWqV QhQcq8PQ/38QX9GYEI80LQE3hX7xlNVoIlVtp41RUCEu5Nlk2EpFpWuQQ8CKCMz/Nx8hpEIr4Ax52 w/J4SuoxuliWWIiySuJaRgsoJjZzJ43XWGiCAt1eJp74nIpSDb/DSE0+bbpDB4KhEMEjRqtnJlmwp +KT+A9s1Ob/Zjg==; From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Stefan Wahren Cc: Wadim Egorov , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Li Yang , Primoz Fiser , Christoph Stoidner , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, upstream@lists.phytec.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support In-Reply-To: <47c79a0a-5be0-4ee8-87d4-fd03809a9664@gmx.net> (Stefan Wahren's message of "Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:39:26 +0100") References: <20240122095306.14084-1-othacehe@gnu.org> <20240122095306.14084-4-othacehe@gnu.org> <537266fe-0bf7-4208-a9f3-ae27f462c6ed@phytec.de> <85fe8c8b-ea08-4f24-9a06-33a5678c1a0a@gmx.net> <7944bd80-32d7-4ac3-9c0a-806394262f1c@phytec.de> <08ef805a-b041-4db0-aaf7-51d5d06596ff@gmx.net> <008317aa-4dd1-4889-8c64-5e4396d83931@phytec.de> <47c79a0a-5be0-4ee8-87d4-fd03809a9664@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:48:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87o7da4zc1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Hello Stefan, >> Defining line names should be fine. But I would still prefer to have >> the muxing in an overlay bound to a specific use case. > I'm fine with this. Unfortunately Mathieu dropped the line names in V5 > today :-( > > AFAIR reviewers should have 2 weeks time maximum. This was just 2 days. I am sorry but it is not easy for me to deal with contradictory input. I chose to remove the gpio-line-names even though it also seemed like a nice addition to me. The idea was to not interfere with Phytec plans in the future. There is no hurry and I can always restore them in a v6. Let me know what you think, Thanks, Mathieu