From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693A61B4C23; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723647977; cv=none; b=Qnq7gtzSEyckCbw09Fnt9bIsjIfGQOZiryjLFggqWsZVzK4Y0gsZpmXPqURdxG8pshXap02ns8vsRM4YrxOcVEcrZnBTMnTJ+D0Xc4nprYlNy3pmJOkHo3jri6aWngxQ9Vyco9STu5E4oDIX3LgnKN+MswddigNzBcMz0FrFQI0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723647977; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OU2N/lJoKy29N++pfrNcOUwH/XmHLRz4RAcUETTINHQ=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PWgmWW0Y7OEd6JTsA4ouA1E/CabBYZ8b5dQOlfSn5FU4y9IjVYdZkv4TCBV0yWOkgZ3K03g2L1RandcCj62NKv22NEVggFDqPT5OjlzQGuW4+FeyxcRVP6R281Zz182m5br2tsiXVLqbHRR6azqbaxOaAgnUd0FtSOaGXXvEQ80= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=tAiYKLbk; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=j6DzcVXm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="tAiYKLbk"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="j6DzcVXm" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1723647974; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kgBDpLd5CRpFg6iGANviJjQZYBMsab2XfI71ntFAp9M=; b=tAiYKLbkjpo3vw7vm6WQ5c7NaedPhBkRMhEoTNaEjtTBNkJoxXr6ch7ieW7REJBS8Bs0bI MFa+tPwBRX6tlTqzlOkNXKFJqYGmLWvZ9WDysaNEfAhIcaMlMI/3ygGfLmajWqPhFF0s1q yT7MMOoKP/YEViRCuJ5mO2f4hMzUtha0fAnOq2umhbBZi0VcQ0vMSJrGAZoJytbmAFBTxB Jo4QqrkLTErYRR4AuF56fvGbFdAjnb6Gdd9bnE0wb1Il1fxN7ZzfA3Pcy7BI+FfXzq+yTq QSPBPJE2RvXKhiKEaXARp2eKHeRbb5B6myXbMlqM6stm/qlbobkrr8b1LuygZQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1723647974; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kgBDpLd5CRpFg6iGANviJjQZYBMsab2XfI71ntFAp9M=; b=j6DzcVXm1ZA8IVRQAornEXvVYXU17kS2Dzdyv1mD/k0CSU+9aqtNO+Omhv5JKo36g68YUk Me2HS01vDRJm2JAA== To: Kevin Chen , robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, andrew@codeconstruct.com.au, kevin_chen@aspeedtech.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/aspeed-intc: Add support for AST27XX INTC In-Reply-To: <20240814114106.2809876-4-kevin_chen@aspeedtech.com> References: <20240814114106.2809876-1-kevin_chen@aspeedtech.com> <20240814114106.2809876-4-kevin_chen@aspeedtech.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:06:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87plqbnnyx.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Aug 14 2024 at 19:41, Kevin Chen wrote: > Support for the Aspeed Interrupt Controller found on Aspeed Silicon SoCs, > such as the AST2700, which is arm64 architecture. > > To support ASPEED interrupt controller(INTC) maps the internal interrupt > sources of the AST27XX device to an parent interrupt controller. This still lacks a Signed-off-by: tag and my comment about the error path in the init function is still valid. Do you think that addressing review feedback is optional? Feel free to ignore it, but don't be surprised if I ignore further patches from you. Take your time and go through stuff properly and do not rush out half baked patches in a frenzy. Thanks, tglx