From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A5451C3A; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.51.188.92 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705995915; cv=none; b=WxDx0KlFdq/wVhnK6r5HUhoRmbo9l4iAAn4DLHdR5RPAqcvXDQ46VtyE1y6hwJ3jl6rk56TOCK+cSe3dNKX7Z3qyeT0EATzGZdFHNdBWieCdV2B9JuN62sjR5R9pECT1y/TMA9X8ZhfjBxWrz0DOesxat4ysHUYgOICEqxHhtyY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705995915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PeGrflTJjw9tp7NkPQZVRHpEGXG8qAQ0CtAN1+Exswg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Rz9vXOzxzYGwBR+XHwcpPf9nWdL1t+WSFBOOp3I5xNMP5oZgHQHrvXGsafQIPVnjzC3REQ0xpIpJPmL6AvqrB/583XOHBup48BNKzxDWvEy81apH+lXI8SvbkmKOm0YWBiJ8M85Dg17cHnKSQo7mWoCTqO0CZrt7b0R/WJBP17g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.b=qjObFO0P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.51.188.92 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.b="qjObFO0P" Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSBT2-0002Jp-1r; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:45:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=PeGrflTJjw9tp7NkPQZVRHpEGXG8qAQ0CtAN1+Exswg=; b=qjObFO0PtsJ8h9C+e/R6 GHMXSONNuwwrprKA57kz8NrOMMUc4bZ+KF+f4KnJTC8VIFbB+bImOBHZ31MDOIZo7UptHZk5goweY +WXjwZYaHBIJflhtLmwH8+zNVwu0pAyQDKiVdme8rj8oCu8isFB2NiZcQ0O9btNJgBLSMuQsXaWTj NvJFOSCYPbraTCVYpXZs44jalcV1YZmQeKMyD+gGjgtT+oMTLPtukXNRVlCcrcYVHZWSDf8uTU4AD pLxahombGLBvqDyi4TdQkDzYPC0/Yn4xWph+i43C2+CuYD3uRZiDI9xw8a6oUF+046/ik7w3YyQc+ o/AoriYqDj+C0g==; From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Wadim Egorov Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Li Yang , Primoz Fiser , Stefan Wahren , Christoph Stoidner , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support In-Reply-To: <537266fe-0bf7-4208-a9f3-ae27f462c6ed@phytec.de> (Wadim Egorov's message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:11:27 +0100") References: <20240122095306.14084-1-othacehe@gnu.org> <20240122095306.14084-4-othacehe@gnu.org> <537266fe-0bf7-4208-a9f3-ae27f462c6ed@phytec.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:44:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87ttn45w94.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Hey Wadim, > You are doing more than you describing in your changes log. > Here you are forcing a gpio-only functionality for the X16 header. But the > pins we route down to the X16 expansion connector can be also used > differently. > Typically we provide device tree overlays for different use cases on this > expansion connectors. Adding those GPIOs on X16 was a suggestion from Stefan back in v3. I must say that it is quite convenient as a user to be able to interact with gpiolib on some GPIOs on the eval board. Would it be a possibility to change the muxing of those two pins in the overlays if the need arises? > Maybe this comment was lost, but I asked to move the dts-v1 tag into the > carrier board device tree. Missed that, sorry. Thanks, Mathieu