From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: omap: add option to indicate wakeup support through DT
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 10:48:03 -0700
Message-ID: <87wqqf11nw.fsf@linaro.org>
References: <1369982005-8572-1-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
	<1369982005-8572-2-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1369982005-8572-2-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> (Hebbar
	Gururaja's message of "Fri, 31 May 2013 12:03:24 +0530")
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, zonque@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, rob@landley.net, a.zummo@towertech.it, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com, sudhakar.raj@ti.com
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:

> Even though RTC-IP is wakeup capable, Not all Boards support it.
>
> For example
> The rtc alarm wakeup is available in rtc-ip since omap1 days but alarm
> was not wired properly in previous ompa1 boards.
>
> 	commit fa5b07820fe3a0fc06ac368516e71f10a59b9539
> 	Author: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
> 	Date:   Wed Oct 27 15:33:05 2010 -0700
>
> 	rtc: omap: let device wakeup capability be configured from chip
> 	init logic
>
> 	The rtc-omap driver currently hardcodes the RTC wakeup
> 	capability to be "not capable".  While this seems to be true for
> 	existing OMAP1 boards which are not wired for this, the
> 	DA850/OMAP-L138 SoC, the RTC can always be wake up source from
> 	its "deep sleep" mode.
>
> Current rtc-omap driver expects the rtc module wake-up capabilities to
> be set up by board specific code. However, in case of DT, this is not
> possible.
>
> So, add a DT property "ti,wakeup_capable" to indicate that the module is
> wake-up capable.

Why is this a TI-specific property?  

Also, I think we can do this without a new DT property.Did you see this
patch from Tony which is already queued for v3.11:

    http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=136917244530612&w=2

I think this is the right way to go.  Platforms that don't want/need
wakeup support can disable it from userspace via:

    echo disabled > /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup

Kevin