From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
adam.rudzinski@arf.net.pl, Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>,
Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: Support enabling clocks prior to bus probe
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 14:50:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <885abb40-cf1c-b464-bf09-08c7235410ef@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200903214238.GF3112546@lunn.ch>
On 9/3/2020 2:42 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:28:22PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> What if a device requires clocks enabled in a certain order or timing?
>> It's not just clocks, you could have some GPIOs or a regulator that
>> need enabling first. It's device specific, so really needs a per
>> device solution. This is not just an issue with MDIO. I think we
>> really need some sort of pre-probe hook in the driver model in order
>> to do any non-discoverable init for discoverable buses.
>
> Hi Rob
>
> How do you solve the chicken/egg of knowing what device specific init
> is needed before you can discover what device you have on the bus?
For MDIO since we have a fixed number of devices on the bus, we could
pre-populate the MDIO map for all addresses, and free up the devices
that we did not probe.
When using DT we can first parse the address, create a mdio_device
there, and then turn on clocks/regulators/GPIOs whatever since we now
have a device reference. Only then do we bind the device with its driver.
If we are using the DT scanning loop because the node did not provide a
"reg" property, then the PHY must be in a functional state to be probed,
we cannot guess what we do not know.
All of this uses MDIO implementation knowledge though.
>
>> Or perhaps forcing probe when there are devices defined in DT if
>> they're not discovered by normal means.
>
> The PHY subsystem has this. You came specify in DT the ID of the
> device which we would normally read during bus discovery. The correct
> driver is then loaded and probed. But it is good practice to avoid
> this. OEMs are known to change the PHY in order to perform cost
> optimisation. So we prefer to do discover and do the right thing if
> the PHY has changed.
>
> As for GPIOS and regulators, i expect this code will expand pretty
> soon after being merged to handle those. There are users wanting
> it. We already have some standard properties defined, in terms of
> gpios, delay while off, delay after turning it on. As for ordering, i
> guess it would make sense to enable the clocks and then hit it with a
> reset? If there is a device which cannot be handled like this, it can
> always hard code its ID in device tree, and fully control its
> resources in the driver.
>
> Andrew
>
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-03 4:39 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: phy: Support enabling clocks prior to bus probe Florian Fainelli
2020-09-03 4:39 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] " Florian Fainelli
2020-09-03 20:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-03 21:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-03 21:28 ` Rob Herring
2020-09-03 21:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-03 21:50 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2020-09-03 21:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-09-03 4:39 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: mdio-bcm-unimac: Enable GPHY resources during bus reset Florian Fainelli
2020-09-03 4:39 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: phy: bcm7xxx: request and manage GPHY clock Florian Fainelli
2020-09-04 6:15 ` Marco Felsch
2020-09-04 15:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-09-07 7:34 ` Marco Felsch
2020-09-07 19:07 ` Marco Felsch
2020-09-04 6:18 ` Marco Felsch
2020-09-04 15:38 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-09-07 7:37 ` Marco Felsch
2020-09-04 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: phy: Support enabling clocks prior to bus probe Florian Fainelli
2020-09-04 6:19 ` Adam Rudziński
2020-09-04 13:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-04 14:00 ` Adam Rudziński
2020-09-04 14:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-04 17:21 ` Adam Rudziński
2020-09-04 13:58 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=885abb40-cf1c-b464-bf09-08c7235410ef@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=adam.rudzinski@arf.net.pl \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.leitner@skidata.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengdejin5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).