From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Rowand Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of: __of_detach_node() - remove node from phandle cache Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:09:03 -0800 Message-ID: <893d9327-4353-066d-2efa-414a3db4c282@gmail.com> References: <1545033396-24485-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> <1545033396-24485-3-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> <871s6gv30z.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Michael Ellerman , mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev , Tyrel Datwyler , tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com, minkim@us.ibm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/18/18 12:01 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 12:57 PM Frank Rowand wrote: >> >> On 12/17/18 2:52 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> Hi Frank, >>> >>> frowand.list@gmail.com writes: >>>> From: Frank Rowand >>>> >>>> Non-overlay dynamic devicetree node removal may leave the node in >>>> the phandle cache. Subsequent calls to of_find_node_by_phandle() >>>> will incorrectly find the stale entry. Remove the node from the >>>> cache. >>>> >>>> Add paranoia checks in of_find_node_by_phandle() as a second level >>>> of defense (do not return cached node if detached, do not add node >>>> to cache if detached). >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Michael Bringmann >>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand >>>> --- >>> >>> Similarly here can we add: >>> >>> Fixes: 0b3ce78e90fc ("of: cache phandle nodes to reduce cost of of_find_node_by_phandle()") >> >> Yes, thanks. >> >> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.17+ >> >> Nope, 0b3ce78e90fc does not belong in stable (it is a feature, not a bug >> fix). So the bug will not be in stable. > > 0b3ce78e90fc landed in v4.17, so Michael's line above is correct. > Annotating it with 4.17 only saves Greg from trying and then emailing > us to backport this patch as it wouldn't apply. Thanks for the correction. I was both under-thinking and over-thinking, ending up with an incorrect answer. Can you add the Cc: to version 3 patch comments (both 1/2 and 2/2) or do you want me to re-spin? -Frank > > Rob >