From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Roman Linev <admin@mswin.me>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: enlarge reserved_mem1
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 15:09:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <894c4e6f-cc8d-4ac8-8401-d37c17003398@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026174436.305327-1-admin@mswin.me>
On 10/26/26 6:44 PM, Roman Linev wrote:
> reserved_mem1@46200000 is sized 0x2d00000 (45 MiB) in the SoC dtsi, so it
> ends at 0x48f00000, while camera_mem begins at 0x4ab00000. The reference
> firmware memory map for sm6125 reserves 0x4900000 (73 MiB) at this base,
> ending exactly where camera_mem starts, so the 28 MiB in between belongs to
> firmware and not to the kernel. The dtsi nevertheless leaves that span as
> normal System RAM and hands it to the page allocator.
>
> Every sm6125 board inherits this reservation and none of them overrides it
> or places another region in the gap, so size it for the firmware map in the
> common dtsi.
>
> On laurel-sprout the mismatch is observable: page-cache pressure eventually
> reaches the span, and a store into it never completes, which hard-locks the
> machine. Before this change the board wedged at roughly one lockup per
> 59 MiB of buffered reads; after enlarging the region the same workload ran
> 691 GiB of buffered reads with no lockups. Booting with CONFIG_MEMTEST=y
> and memtest=1 sweeps 17 free ranges with no bad ranges reported and skips
> 0x46200000..0x4ab00000 entirely, confirming the carveout is out of the page
> allocator's pool.
>
> The downstream laurel_sprout device tree describes the same base as
> removed_region@46200000 with a size of 0x4900000, so the reserved bytes are
> not a new claim about this hardware family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Linev <admin@mswin.me>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Konrad
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 3:25 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout: reserve firmware-owned DRAM Roman Linev
2026-08-24 13:23 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-08-24 15:55 ` [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-xiaomi-laurel-sprout: enlarge reserved_mem1 Roman Linev
2026-10-26 15:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-10-26 17:44 ` [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: " Roman Linev
2026-10-28 14:09 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=894c4e6f-cc8d-4ac8-8401-d37c17003398@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=admin@mswin.me \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox