From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.mainlining.org (mail.mainlining.org [5.75.144.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2444A34F241; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 21:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.75.144.95 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773092947; cv=none; b=LnUcqNXIUFksN7hze0K0VzIcPUa9C2+xPGVPpgxecRT5Pt1qHkHsFQ0hYN7JnpOfF+O8/mLpbQHEcm+f84lnwJ1QGLPfoBBDPoK59wTegpoZy2rtuHZDhBmbrOuTGUGsniQwve6p9wIKk/WNnAVhL4MC5HvLd8YsRClXNMCZlDw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773092947; c=relaxed/simple; bh=usin7BYKGyGID/KA2MpWwRceLuxQs1ugOXr22irERWo=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=k7iFvzqie9D/e+LnFuirKhDta15wUMOwTxFlKbVENYX4PSDiv6qxDDRm9Eh5kBE1beER6ku20YDuoBv/fqZP1o+1849CTSwByTePDj9LVku0ickazfircBF5lDnAnOnzFq3acb+Q9YgVR+OZy2qhyqXecJ/YwIb3y2bKfM+G9UI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mainlining.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mainlining.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b=hSe/vbBY; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b=6PQ7E4io; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.75.144.95 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mainlining.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mainlining.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b="hSe/vbBY"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b="6PQ7E4io" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=202507r; d=mainlining.org; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; t=1773092938; bh=lT2AvHoLYuBoYFn2IztXqCJ 7Z6kWDCvjetxjOt3z6Xg=; b=hSe/vbBYL9kXtPt1wa2I2gDvG8ntiWxvOFSRwjnIZ56Pa4jcA2 VCWqfVHaUbKCJX1MueTLl7rGkotqfv3EhPtXYCKID5jOnXUSLWIM8gxVOonN5NDw9wjHNPskQ8M vgHL4IH8ecLbNBVf/YKjCdNI2nQfrWRWrHUhg0ol4s0u6WsfBGckrV13CTDjNMB0qPS58Yn+fGa TLzJY5rr47ydF/wtmK1Etu+5o2oleVb5OaFZSjXTg2TISWePEQnbjpPUR8gNxREFQvHEI3eXTtP AmXoggESqVmegEnJT0LB3h1djXqPLu/l3GQU0hA2jhvRb1kLtws2apMMq/aqIupHlHA==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; s=202507e; d=mainlining.org; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; t=1773092938; bh=lT2AvHoLYuBoYFn2IztXqCJ 7Z6kWDCvjetxjOt3z6Xg=; b=6PQ7E4iovfFJ1MraJWChEMHirzaRTd7DE7mIH1A+zdONMmzLop d7EdXQHhkxCu6+BaELsDkMWbeyKue7PCowDA==; Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 22:48:58 +0100 From: barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org To: Konrad Dybcio Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, linux@mainlining.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8917-xiaomi-riva: Commonize for Redmi 4A and GO In-Reply-To: References: <20260305-riva-common-v1-0-436f1f4b7399@mainlining.org> <20260305-riva-common-v1-1-436f1f4b7399@mainlining.org> Message-ID: <89ec6b4f9ff67a8ea035534da9b866fe@mainlining.org> X-Sender: barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2026-03-09 13:55, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 3/5/26 6:28 PM, Barnabás Czémán wrote: >> Redmi 5A is very similar for Redmi 4A (rolex) and Redmi GO (tiare), >> it can be commonized for avoid unnecessary code duplications. >> >> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán >> --- > > Could you please try adding the following to your gitconfig: > > [diff] > renameLimit = 999999 > algorithm = histogram # or 'copies' > renames = copies > > and see if this generates a shorter diff? It is inverting the diff there will be less change in msm8917-xiaomi-riva-common.dtsi and a lot of deletion in msm8917-xiaomi-riva.dts. I can split the commit in that case rename will be shown properly but riva devicetree will be removed temporarily. > > Konrad