devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Marius.Cristea@microchip.com>
To: <jic23@kernel.org>, <nuno.sa@analog.com>, <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	<andy@kernel.org>
Cc: <robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	<broonie@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adding support for PAC194X
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 15:21:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8afdba49fbb3750a64313ac351a855a58b0043c5.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fdbcb45-ed9a-4449-9248-9bc1d5593fa9@baylibre.com>

Hi David,

   Thanks for the suggestion.

//Marius

On Tue, 2025-06-10 at 11:35 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
> 
> On 6/10/25 11:04 AM, Marius.Cristea@microchip.com wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-06-10 at 10:22 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > > know the content is safe
> > > 
> > > On 6/10/25 9:46 AM, Marius.Cristea@microchip.com wrote:
> > > > Hi David,
> > > > 
> > > >    Thank you for the feedback. Please see my comments below...
> > > > 
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Using Jonathan's suggestion from v2 to just have a single
> > > > > property
> > > > > with 3 different
> > > > > ranges to chose from seems simpler that this. It would only
> > > > > require
> > > > > one property
> > > > > and would be self-documenting. The description could be
> > > > > shortened
> > > > > to
> > > > > just a couple
> > > > > of lines.
> > > > 
> > > > I was thinking to add the range for this property, but it looks
> > > > (for me
> > > > at least) more complicated from the checking point of view. The
> > > > driver
> > > > is supporting two family of devices that has, each, 3 different
> > > > voltage
> > > > range as an input.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Usually, having a consistent binding for the same thing among
> > > similar
> > > devices is more important than how easy it is to implement in the
> > > driver.
> > > 
> > > Since this seems to be a common pattern, we could probably
> > > justify an
> > > iio_property_match_ranges() helper function that would simplify
> > > the
> > > implementation in drivers that would need to use such a property.
> > > Then
> > > in each driver it would just be a matter of making a static const
> > > array
> > > lookup table of ranges for each device and calling the helper
> > > function.
> > 
> > Sorry for not explaining very well. I have implemented the range
> > into
> > the driver and I was working well, but I had issues defining the
> > range
> > into the device binding and the checker was failing. That was the
> > reason that I've dropped the range from the binding. Also I had
> > some
> > issues enforcing a certain "available" ranges for a particular part
> > into the binding.
> 
> What did you try?
> 
> The usual way is to define all possibilities and then limit it by
> compatible.
> I think something like this should work:
> 
> patternProperties:
>   "^channel@[1-4]$":
>     properties:
>       microchip,input-range-microvolt:
>        items:
>           - enum: [-32000000, -16000000, -9000000, -4500000, 0]
>           - enum: [4500000, 9000000, 16000000, 32000000]
> 
> 
> allOf:
>   - if:
>       properties:
>         compatible:
>           pattern: "^microchip,pac194"
>      then:
>        patternProperties:
>         "^channel@[1-4]$":
>           properties:
>             microchip,input-range-microvolt:
>               oneOf:
>                 - items:
>                     - const: 0
>                     - const: 9000000
>                 - items:
>                     - const: -9000000
>                     - const: 9000000
>                 - items:
>                     - const: -4500000
>                     - const: 4500000
>               default:
>                 items:
>                   - const: 0
>                   - const: 9000000
>   - if:
>       properties:
>         compatible:
>           pattern: "^microchip,pac195"
>      then:
>        patternProperties:
>         "^channel@[1-4]$":
>           properties:
>             microchip,input-range-microvolt:
>               oneOf:
>                 - items:
>                     - const: 0
>                     - const: 32000000
>                 - items:
>                     - const: -32000000
>                     - const: 32000000
>                 - items:
>                     - const: -16000000
>                     - const: 16000000
>               default:
>                 items:
>                   - const: 0
>                   - const: 32000000
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-17 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-06  9:39 [PATCH v3 0/2] adding support for Microchip PAC194X Power Monitor marius.cristea
2025-06-06  9:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adding support for PAC194X marius.cristea
2025-06-06 15:53   ` David Lechner
2025-06-10 14:46     ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-10 15:22       ` David Lechner
2025-06-10 16:04         ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-10 16:35           ` David Lechner
2025-06-17 15:21             ` Marius.Cristea [this message]
2025-06-06 16:24   ` Conor Dooley
2025-06-06  9:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] " marius.cristea
2025-06-06 17:02   ` David Lechner
2025-06-10 15:07     ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-10 16:11       ` David Lechner
2025-06-11 15:59         ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-10 20:20       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-07 15:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-10 15:58     ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-11 16:12       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8afdba49fbb3750a64313ac351a855a58b0043c5.camel@microchip.com \
    --to=marius.cristea@microchip.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).