From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E0E39FD8 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719735409; cv=none; b=rz9oFDy2OD8TYflIXJyn2+lK3pSL9RebWyu/GNBMNrTlyNmhUsGHWX2mv3eCXDIm2LciF3g+xFINapaEBDEQCbJ36mrtXmdLCdNpGIHWyK3TipcVYU38dkF/DF0r4qvhEfrxh3p4Pwp5jAmaDau2WHb+1B5w3HDUNenHNSnvG/Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719735409; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3rks19BU69J660UUpP8UicwKVhl2DNmUnOUPCS2SooQ=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=q6e+UFqC+brQoxzI0Q2MPpdWIvZXPCb5t/LNwPUv2xqrTu2OlzhOfZzHv40pww27ro/Cif+w21ohbReRiXAhfGJfpjHn/krHZQqprqDxD3eKqSSFrmNjH+H1o3dXMf6ZgfO5ZpK1J81/BCHIMF/jUAnRtI+hNSrh/H3xY0Hu42A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=testtoast.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=testtoast.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=testtoast.com header.i=@testtoast.com header.b=hBAAlkwj; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=hCjwWtkc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=testtoast.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=testtoast.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=testtoast.com header.i=@testtoast.com header.b="hBAAlkwj"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="hCjwWtkc" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1027138029E; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:16:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap47 ([10.202.2.97]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:16:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=testtoast.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1719735406; x= 1719821806; bh=Zj5cTqAbQXZZPzHkl1b0qvz5sB+DToZiKbYJ/h2vOHg=; b=h BAAlkwj14rJH+n2JlouQI1BNdEO0QNgS4rXrvz7Rx13BF6DWmndtuk5mtmQU7ULP kkmmbWNqidlDVuUpczeLNEy0bQSytOjIwNNyi6quU6+byXX8MVEFmjMybRwlu9Jg yCN/cvL2EiHK/qB5Ui/5Hi9chOGxGoziD9Jae3QESqHlk//Q3gqSzd1CO0YUk/Jl 5V4AB6rZv9cXT+lqIN3FQ1l+rGhbfEj9Fax0ZIJCnTSYFu37MU98r/mynkHecUg/ W7IR+JaZoVA+qMwege1B+ejSBOoK40y2CLFqn83lFdcAxnjhFPhd7X0Qw9t/HVrT bnOuuZ+XrHS2JsalyxsMQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1719735406; x=1719821806; bh=Zj5cTqAbQXZZPzHkl1b0qvz5sB+D ToZiKbYJ/h2vOHg=; b=hCjwWtkcYSmYkKwNxdU+KnA5EkV84adgDT+1IJp/YswI OQd1gjIUBfQLI/bA3fhj9p6GYKnAjrC7UchhDZUbcGTNT3Mu9NvIaHXmXr6+N3tU zTcU25+ViKCpwOYe6DBOfKJH7IsPcxZ1HzNzRHS/Dsx002fUiwEBKfAMMzKrmbC3 9PO/DVlMMpJmmvceQH0hXJLbSDa9rV9DcmtZC7+FkkNpNtPHsrWZjhEYBFjEHLvr nX/ehpwOZx5Drk6BO0sVanFOtNKC/Mg6sVJeurqVQvfLNSZy+CWUxw6/3WHj6ZKR Hkye0L1vcn66NE1HWHXAcNfAFAXOlnEuwoPQjM474g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddruddugddtudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfthigr nhcuhggrlhhklhhinhdfuceorhihrghnsehtvghsthhtohgrshhtrdgtohhmqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeehvdevieegudejueefgeffhefhffevudfhieejgfdtffetlefgteeu veeiudeijeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehrhigrnhesthgvshhtthhorghsthdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: idc0145fc:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id A81D2A60078; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:16:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-538-g1508afaa2-fm-20240616.001-g1508afaa Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <8b4519fc-0fba-48fe-bfb4-318818b47a65@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20240627-muskox-of-nonconcrete-art-e4bcfd@houat> References: <20240626112005.248576-1-ryan@testtoast.com> <20240626112005.248576-2-ryan@testtoast.com> <20240626-loyal-squirrel-of-charisma-4e784f@houat> <20240626-procreate-goldmine-800179f909e9@spud> <20240627-muskox-of-nonconcrete-art-e4bcfd@houat> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:16:24 +1200 From: "Ryan Walklin" To: "Maxime Ripard" , "Conor Dooley" Cc: "Neil Armstrong" , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Jessica Zhang" , "Sam Ravnborg" , "David Airlie" , "Daniel Vetter" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Hironori KIKUCHI" , "Chris Morgan" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Rename WL-355608-A8 panel Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, at 5:59 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 04:34:11PM GMT, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:04:19PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 02:25:54PM GMT, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> > > Can it be more specific ? because there's a lot of rg35xx defined in bindings: >> > > anbernic,rg351m >> > > anbernic,rg351v >> > > anbernic,rg353p >> > > anbernic,rg353ps >> > > anbernic,rg353v >> > > anbernic,rg353vs >> > > anbernic,rg35xx-2024 >> > > anbernic,rg35xx-plus >> > > anbernic,rg35xx-h Just to note only the three rg35xx-* devices use this particular panel. >> > >> > Yeah, if we have an identified model name, we should probably use that, >> > with a comment that we couldn't figure out what the vendor was and thus >> > went for anbernic. >> >> What's wrong with using the wl name that already exists as the model? >> Using rg-panel is total invention on our part, especially >> seeing as the commit message says that multiple models can use it. > > Yeah, that makes sense, sorry for the noise > Thanks both for the further feedback, agreed logical to use the device vendor and panel serial number, ie "anbernic,wl-355608-a8". Will post a V2 with a comment to that effect. Regards, Ryan