From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.mainlining.org (mail.mainlining.org [5.75.144.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD202F83BE; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 12:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.75.144.95 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757334425; cv=none; b=NQySwu9IWV+F46AtdP3JD1Uvnl2FNgDc6ycUAE48BvNcXS51dXivaw/Nqwoo8Po0/3MWseUZjWFmA9Kk5N+VFCjUPiDqUBezW0+2p0aOnrBsm3slszya9lX1QezZhPol+lWSg1uR3fSlsZ2uTUkt/PpdZoH43PRcEXohwkXbBwI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757334425; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MiRTds9oiHs/B6UcYSFxHsmBL56uVVXDD3bgZ0EEB6Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rhYGjnWtFPLyy8tZt//EGPoSp6Jels7icE8jkGJsWnrxpXMu6LtquPHGKgy7dqupRykfN8XXZguXh6gjFIq6KvJT5XeeefWd5iFxVZfcLtOgE1TVY8cHLZxlQP7mxUW8b7AWYeMd4gTJKq7yOSXTQc7nIXIvA07Q5Zh+/bK02Qk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mainlining.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mainlining.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b=b75V3OJP; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b=uus1gG0P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.75.144.95 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mainlining.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mainlining.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b="b75V3OJP"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b="uus1gG0P" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=202507r; d=mainlining.org; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID; t=1757333976; bh=1V7HualNevRitDqxwUJewH6 4/Z3JcnH9c2FyaK3ahH8=; b=b75V3OJP4qtGMgtOuQtFef/eYMsNGtEAhY8FvUot/6or6xiKfG g8ZMY+fkL2aBJ73JnbQuU0mpMeGKLCaCs7vTkdoMR4MstunjMI71pH2lPErLhKzOQHEPja2mUfK +TZCbr1c48WEvw7gldiQPNJxBpbL8upA7OMaXu6Gn/P85/1fF1JYDugOiI8hjMU3R8RpmGhlqRK p4GQmRGI62qDuD4L/nuUQAPsVcYNOciDd61lB4FeVrOt+MkUg/FcvlUr+cDLWAePQ18CdqQ67rh ocnL8jiUVo+usKNzFxrjgRF/9vPp6t+3hodhWOIWXbGtzzWVbfvB+16yPusktUvyxdA==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; s=202507e; d=mainlining.org; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID; t=1757333976; bh=1V7HualNevRitDqxwUJewH6 4/Z3JcnH9c2FyaK3ahH8=; b=uus1gG0Pd2nT4ds7jb6CHWnAL5cscnLJZ0f8pAJzq1o+Nrt6nR HBx9OWOtthScdROz5RIcCsG+dYW80C3DVqAA==; Message-ID: <8b8e9545-7e39-4b6c-b453-59f815318f87@mainlining.org> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:19:34 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM To: Linus Walleij Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, linux@mainlining.org, Nickolay Goppen , Richard Acayan References: <20250903-sdm660-lpass-lpi-v5-0-fe171098b6a1@mainlining.org> Content-Language: ru-RU, en-US From: Nickolay Goppen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 08.09.2025 15:18, Linus Walleij пишет: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 3:43 PM Nickolay Goppen wrote: > >> This patch series adds SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM pinctrl driver and >> introduces pin_offset field for LPI pinctrl drivers to support >> SDM660's quirky pin_offsets taken from an array with >> predefined offsets from downstream [1]. >> >> [1] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-4.4/-/blob/LA.UM.7.2.c27-07400-sdm660.0/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpi.c#L107 >> >> Signed-off-by: Nickolay Goppen > This seems ready for merge if you fix the last few comments > and collect the ACKs/Reviewed-by, can you send a v6 > addressing this? Yes, of course. Just a moment. > Yours, > Linus Walleij -- Best regards, Nickolay