From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.linux@gmail.com>,
David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Reenable crypto & cryptobam
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:34:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8eb45771-096a-443f-b017-3ec8bc4940ba@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CZ6FR855VPP7.3GHX4EO9WEZIH@fairphone.com>
On 16.02.2024 11:36 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Mon Jan 8, 2024 at 11:45 PM CET, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 16:23, Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon Jan 8, 2024 at 3:18 PM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 8.01.2024 14:49, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>>> When num-channels and qcom,num-ees is not provided in devicetree, the
>>>>> driver will try to read these values from the registers during probe but
>>>>> this fails if the interconnect is not on and then crashes the system.
>>>>>
>>>>> So we can provide these properties in devicetree (queried after patching
>>>>> BAM driver to enable the necessary interconnect) so we can probe
>>>>> cryptobam without reading registers and then also use the QCE as
>>>>> expected.
>>>>
>>>> This really feels a bit backwards.. Enable the resource to query the
>>>> hardware for numbers, so that said resource can be enabled, but
>>>> slightly later :/
>>>
>>> If you think adding interconnect support to driver and dtsi is better,
>>> let me know.
>>
>> I'd say, adding the proper interconnect is a better option. Otherwise
>> we just depend on the QCE itself to set up the vote for us.
>
> Yes, currently we depend on that.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Stephan (+CC) mentioned it should be okay like this *shrug*
>>>
>>> For the record, this is the same way I got the values for sc7280[0] and
>>> sm6350[1].
>>>
>>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231229-sc7280-cryptobam-fixup-v1-1-bd8f68589b80@fairphone.com/
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240105-sm6350-qce-v1-0-416e5c7319ac@fairphone.com/
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
>>> index b46236235b7f..cd4dd9852d9e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
>>> @@ -1756,8 +1756,8 @@ cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 {
>>> qcom,controlled-remotely;
>>> iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x594 0x0011>,
>>> <&apps_smmu 0x596 0x0011>;
>>> - /* FIXME: Probing BAM DMA causes some abort and system hang */
>>> - status = "fail";
>>> + interconnects = <&aggre2_noc MASTER_CRYPTO 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>;
>>> + interconnect-names = "memory";
>>> };
>>>
>>> crypto: crypto@1dfa000 {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
>>> index 5e7d332731e0..9de28f615639 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
>>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/circ_buf.h>
>>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>>> #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
>>> +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
>>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>>
>>> #include "../dmaengine.h"
>>> @@ -394,6 +395,7 @@ struct bam_device {
>>> const struct reg_offset_data *layout;
>>>
>>> struct clk *bamclk;
>>> + struct icc_path *mem_path;
>>> int irq;
>>>
>>> /* dma start transaction tasklet */
>>> @@ -1206,6 +1208,7 @@ static int bam_init(struct bam_device *bdev)
>>> bdev->num_channels = val & BAM_NUM_PIPES_MASK;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s:%d DBG num_ees=%u num_channels=%u\n", __func__, __LINE__, bdev->num_ees, bdev->num_channels);
>>> /* Reset BAM now if fully controlled locally */
>>> if (!bdev->controlled_remotely && !bdev->powered_remotely)
>>> bam_reset(bdev);
>>> @@ -1298,6 +1301,14 @@ static int bam_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + bdev->mem_path = devm_of_icc_get(bdev->dev, "memory");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(bdev->mem_path))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(bdev->mem_path);
>>> +
>>> + ret = icc_set_bw(bdev->mem_path, 1, 1);
>>
>> Probably this needs some more sensible value.
>
> So downstream qcedev driver uses 384 for the interconnect. But this is
> crypto-specific and probably different BAMs have different minimum
> requirements?
>
> #define CRYPTO_AVG_BW 384
> #define CRYPTO_PEAK_BW 384
> https://github.com/xiaomi-sm8450-kernel/android_kernel_platform_msm-kernel/blob/lineage-20/drivers/crypto/msm/qce.h#L57
>
> Do you have any suggestion what to use here?
I'dve expected this to mean anything, but apparently not.
My immediate guess is that the 384 was the lowest magic value that didn't
result in the bus getting kicked offline.. 1 should be fine upstream due
to commit 91e045b93db7 ("interconnect: qcom: Fix small BW votes being
truncated to zero").
>
> Also I'd assume that with pm_runtime suspended we'd need to clear the
> votes in the driver so we don't keep the interconnect alive
> unnecessarily?
My naive understanding is that the power should only be necessary when
the thing is in use, so early probe and pm-active sounds about sane..
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-08 13:49 [PATCH RFT] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Reenable crypto & cryptobam Luca Weiss
2024-01-08 14:18 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-01-08 14:22 ` Luca Weiss
2024-01-08 22:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-16 10:36 ` Luca Weiss
2024-03-27 21:34 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2024-07-05 12:44 ` Luca Weiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8eb45771-096a-443f-b017-3ec8bc4940ba@linaro.org \
--to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bhupesh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).