From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Brugger Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:47:32 +0100 Message-ID: <8eefb7b1-94a9-feb5-3d69-51563b2e9d5e@gmail.com> References: <1479353915-5043-1-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479353915-5043-4-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479784905.8964.15.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479866054.8964.21.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479894203.8964.29.camel@mtksdaap41> <1483670099.18931.5.camel@mtksdaap41> <974d20f3-5133-0869-2a35-c1617bec5d6e@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hans Verkuil , Rick Chang Cc: Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Minghsiu Tsai , James Liao List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/01/17 19:45, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> Hi Rick, >> >> On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you >>> have >>> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could >>> merge >>> the source code and dt-binding first? >> >> Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is >> the reason >> it hasn't been merged yet? >> >> If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging >> this media >> patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro >> can handle. >> >> If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until >> it is >> merged. >> > > I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems > that it got never posted. > > Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds > a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi? > Ah I forgot, dts patches should go through my tree, so Hans please don't merge this patch. Bindings should go through your branch though. Thanks, Matthias