From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-175.mta1.migadu.com (out-175.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 788159445 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 22:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.175 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709938122; cv=none; b=CFHGdaGvmRUD0ziBgBplBauLoat1JJaPCFkAe10SwnysiW6pnLbBEuBxzeYR/PdEDfJbWP5yDNvxS1NcrPXTOaaT4RmgbkyDCr3gMtkH0TSKCyZcJl634oPqjL5zpiJso+qSJ5AGHs8DyzFiNZcnfdTohG3cHiJgtuYda04/Gn4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709938122; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yIdEDO0jYpKzAR2jMGZKtnbESLuRDJyKLv3nt907f0A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cX3dBm92T7aIQFhRy5h4nPIqzI5ZRq0H6yiicBRIooaFG3/Agg1P+TWDJGfxDNlpYpcJEQOxNWlsutw+dmQ+0z3jJccV6lJk6rt0gDwvaXhGwe1TN4P5/dhOJcssYxtg+9aNRa42olz665BKl4R5UnZhqhc06RV5t7oXbjjFwCQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b=RM40uu7A; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.175 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b="RM40uu7A" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1709938117; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4iEh2PMAUq+7v3qjBOKf2/gx+vzkeT997C4mreJlVU4=; b=RM40uu7AwPrTqjawLoFu7T9zpWxdHhjnXWmWCnb+S/8orp6Q2e34vpM+jX/kpk+I8SqH5O HdzB3Do4nUpSTPaSxEh/UJby9BgFwj8v5jSm8V2MReALzIPLU2/TPlIapA/8b+B9IWciRm UDPcmBZJqESD+Fw2Yqb+SBt1nw8mX86KvhgmLh0NJuzkdJ5plwvoHlLS6cjjM2NZe54n3T pHj5dLce0LVuAyGJsoNSXtfRO8rWLgCAHnuBJtfc2HXox+qb581voja2MUtXJE1h6HZD5T LZ1QxUcPpZZQhOz1ZHIwgnsN2iKNwLUNQ9JvSAelpjELY4MHNaoe0EPaJyyqDQ== From: Diederik de Haas To: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Anand Moon , Dragan Simic Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for RK356x Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 23:48:18 +0100 Message-ID: <90122541.GozVr7r7Y5@bagend> Organization: Connecting Knowledge In-Reply-To: <2285ee41e165813011220f9469e28697923aa6e0.1709491108.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> References: <2285ee41e165813011220f9469e28697923aa6e0.1709491108.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2622059.124UsDBANS"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT --nextPart2622059.124UsDBANS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; protected-headers="v1" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Diederik de Haas To: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 23:48:18 +0100 Message-ID: <90122541.GozVr7r7Y5@bagend> Organization: Connecting Knowledge MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sunday, 3 March 2024 20:04:50 CET Dragan Simic wrote: > Add missing cache information to the Rockchip RK356x SoC dtsi, to allow > the userspace, which includes /proc/cpuinfo and lscpu(1), to present proper > RK3566 and RK3568 cache information. Also, it gets rid of the following > error in the kernel log: > > cacheinfo: Unable to detect cache hierarchy for CPU 0 I tried it out on my PineTab2 (rk3566) and while I didn't see any change in `/proc/cpuinfo`, I did see a/the change in `lscpu` and the above quoted warning is now gone. Thanks :-) Tested-By: Diederik de Haas --nextPart2622059.124UsDBANS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZeuVswAKCRDXblvOeH7b bm2kAPkBh88cqsatrMOjm+deVfE2DD9kLUUkNJY6NmzYGcfybwD+N9eFMp/OHYXz T5O8TdtD111Zzvj1v66f0AOcUpzrnAY= =ARvb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2622059.124UsDBANS--