devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Rick Wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_unmap_addr()
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 17:22:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <902d1e4e-3c4e-4590-a810-77a1d11ce57d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241010070911.ozwrpho3wddb4ezf@thinkpad>

On 10/10/24 16:09, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 01:12:09PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
>>
>> There is no need to loop over all regions to find the memory window used
>> to map an address. We can use rockchip_ob_region() to determine the
>> region index, together with a check that the address passed as argument
>> is the address used to create the mapping. Furthermore, the
>> ob_region_map bitmap should also be checked to ensure that we are not
>> attempting to unmap an address that is not mapped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 8 ++------
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
>> index 5a07084fb7c4..89ebdf3e4737 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
>> @@ -256,13 +256,9 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_ep_unmap_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, u8 vfn,
>>  {
>>  	struct rockchip_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
>>  	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = &ep->rockchip;
>> -	u32 r;
>> -
>> -	for (r = 0; r < ep->max_regions; r++)
>> -		if (ep->ob_addr[r] == addr)
>> -			break;
>> +	u32 r = rockchip_ob_region(addr);
>>  
>> -	if (r == ep->max_regions)
>> +	if (addr != ep->ob_addr[r] || !test_bit(r, &ep->ob_region_map))
> 
> Having these two checks looks redundant to me. Is it possible that an address
> could pass only one check?

Yes, if the wrong address is passed to rockchip_pcie_ep_unmap_addr() but that
address still correspond to an ob_region that is being used.

We could do add a WARN_ON_ONCE() around that if condition as calling that
function with an invalid address would mean that either the epc core or the
function driver is buggy.




-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-11  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07  4:12 [PATCH v3 00/12] Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Fix address translation unit programming Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:02   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-10  8:41     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10 10:36       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Use a macro to define EP controller .align feature Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:03   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_unmap_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:09   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  8:22     ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_map_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:13   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12  9:31     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 12:02       ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:39         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Implement the .map_align() controller operation Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  2:43   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-10  3:44   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor rockchip_pcie_ep_probe() memory allocations Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:23   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor rockchip_pcie_ep_probe() MSI-X hiding Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  7:25   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-10  8:09     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-10  8:37       ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-11  8:30       ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:14         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  8:25     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:12       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor endpoint link training enable Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  8:22   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  8:45     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] PCI: rockship-ep: Introduce rockchip_pcie_ep_stop() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  8:24   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve link training Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10 10:35   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  8:55     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:16       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-17  0:52         ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] dt-bindings: pci: rockchip,rk3399-pcie-ep: Add ep-gpios property Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  6:12   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-07  6:50     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  6:54       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-07  6:58         ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  7:00           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-10-07  7:22             ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  7:27               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-07  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] PCI: rockchip-ep: Handle PERST# signal in endpoint mode Damien Le Moal
2024-10-10  4:35   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-10 10:49   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-11  9:30     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-12 12:31       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-15  6:24         ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07  4:45 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Damien Le Moal
2024-10-07 10:02 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-10-07 10:26   ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=902d1e4e-3c4e-4590-a810-77a1d11ce57d@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).