Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>,
	Guru Das Srinagesh <linux@gurudas.dev>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom,scm: Document SCM on Shikra SoC
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 17:53:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <903e383b-e7e3-4ab7-a2d0-77f95d25069e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d7141d7-3440-4360-bed2-d690fb30a116@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 08/05/2026 08:24, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>>>       then:
>>>         required:
>>> @@ -165,6 +167,7 @@ allOf:
>>>                 - qcom,scm-msm8660
>>>                 - qcom,scm-msm8960
>>>                 - qcom,scm-qcm2290
>>> +              - qcom,scm-shikra
>>>                 - qcom,scm-sm6375
>> This looks wrong or the diff hunks are confusing. Aren't you changing
>> one if:then: block for clocks and then second different one which
>> disallows clocks?
>>
>> dtbs_check on your DTS would tell you...
> 
> The two hunks touch two separate allOf blocks:
> 
> - Block 1 (required: [clocks, clock-names]): SoCs that need clocks at all
> - Block 2 (clock-names: [core], clocks maxItems: SoCs using exactly one 
> clock named core
> 
> Both hunks are intentional.
> Verified with dtbs_check — no complaints.

Yes, you are right.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-14 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-01 17:53 [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom,scm: Document SCM on Shikra SoC Komal Bajaj
2026-05-04 11:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-08  6:24   ` Komal Bajaj
2026-05-14 15:53     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-05-14 15:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=903e383b-e7e3-4ab7-a2d0-77f95d25069e@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@gurudas.dev \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robimarko@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox